Search Results

1. Carley (INZ) v Pastushenko [2016] NZIACDT 10 (16 March 2016) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...allowing a person to work in their service knowing that the person is not entitled to do so. [4.4.3] Accordingly, Ms Pastushenko was in breach of section 350(1), and accordingly 3(a) of the 2014 Code. The responses [5] The complainant did not file a statement of reply, and was not required to do so if he agreed with the contents of the statement of complaint. [6] Ms Pastushenko filed a statement of reply; the critical element of her response was that her company did not employ the...

2. Harcourts Group Limited v CAC306 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...subject of the appeal. An issue was raised with him as to whether it was proper to appear as counsel in support of advice drafting which he had given. The hearing was adjourned for the parties to consider this issue. [6] Subsequently the parties filed a joint memorandum in which they advised the Tribunal that the Authority consented to the appeal being allowed. The grounds on which this was said to be appropriate were that the appellant had obtained advice on the drafting of the list...

3. Eaglesome v Department of Corrections (Referral back to Human Rights Commission) [2015] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Department of Corrections (Interim Orders) [2015] NZHRRT (8 June 2015). [3] Subsequently, by letter dated 1 July 2015, Mr Eaglesome gave notice he will be released from prison on 6 July 2015. The consent memorandum [4] On 2 July 2015 the parties filed a consent memorandum asking that this matter be referred back to the Human Rights Commission on the basis that the complaint may yet be able to be resolved by the parties and the Commission by mediation. The Tribunal was asked to suspe...

4. CW v XB LCRO 213 / 2010 (15 June 2011) [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...hearing was conducted on 2 June, this being an Applicant-Only hearing. The Applicant had requested the hearing and it appeared unnecessary to require the 3 Respondent to appear, given that all of the relevant information appeared to be on the file. [10] The Applicant suggested that there were two parts to the complaint. The first part alleged that the Respondent had deliberately obtained the writ of sale and sought to have the debtor’s house sold with full knowledge tha...

5. Eggers v Wellington City Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 26 [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...between the 14 February 2011 and the date of removal they had been put to the extra expense of preparing for the first telephone conference, perusing the Council’s documents, the expert report and extra correspondence. They had also commenced filing a response and a formal application for removal as well as reviewing all other material filed in the claim. [12] Brooker said that the delay has been the cause of $3,000 of the $4,770.95 costs that they incurred. [13] The cl...

6. 2017 NZSSAA 009 (31 March 2017) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Auckland on 15 February 2017 Appearances The appellant in person. Noel Ellis, lay advocate, appeared by AVL for the appellant. Elaine Kirkman for the Ministry of Social Development DECISION Background [1] On 12 November 2015 Mr Ellis filed a Notice of Appeal by email on behalf of Ms XXXX. Ms XXXX appeals a decision of the Benefits Review Committee issued on 20 July 2015 to confirm the decision to provide assistance of $180 rent arrears to Ms XXXX as a recoverable Advan...

7. SLA v MTD [2014] NZIACDT 34 (20 March 2014) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...she was required to use a licensed immigration adviser. 3 The adviser’s Statement of Reply [6] The adviser’s Statement of Reply responds to the complaint in the following terms: [6.1] The adviser said it was not necessary to file a medical certificate for the student visa, and she advised the complainant of that fact. However, the complainant wanted to file it so that it would remain valid, as she expected to apply for a long-term visa later. [6.2] The adviser inf...

8. 2017 NZSSAA 059 (11 October 2017) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...The Authority pointed out to the appellant that the decision subject to the appeal had been reversed, and it appeared that there was no more favourable decision that the Authority could make regarding the matter. It is evident from the material filed in the appeal that the Ministry has gone to some trouble to provide a calculation of the arrears due after reinstating the jobseeker support payments, but the appellant had not provided any 4 information that addressed that ca...

9. [2017] NZEnvC 039 Qambi Properties Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...notices of requirement to alter City Rail Link designation 1714 and North Auckland Line designation 6300. Qambi Properties Limited v Auckland Council Introduction 2 REASONS [1] On 9 December 2016 the appellant, Qambi Properties Limited filed a notice of appeal against the Auckland Council's decision granting consent to construct the Aotea Station to North Auckland Line section of the City Rail Link. [2] Subsequently a direction was sought that the appeal be placed on...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 60 Sexton v Lowe [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...redacted. (e) A GST number for Jabroli Trust. (f) IRD and GST numbers for Mr Lowe. (g) Copies of any receipts for a Site Safe course or for any other induction courses relating to Mr Sexton. (h) Any documentation relating to Mr Sexton filed by Mr Lowe regarding security clearance at Auckland International Airport, or site passes for Fletcher Construction Company Limited (Fletchers). (i) Any documentation relating to Mr Sexton regarding rates he was paid and a breakdown...