Search Results

1. KS v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 540 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 20 working days if you have be...

2. PSPLA-company-licence-annual-return-smart-form-July-2025.pdf [pdf, 524 KB]

   ...to the Authority. • You can also print and fill in this form by hand. Use a black pen or blue pen, and print clearly IN CAPITALS. • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise. Payment information The fee for filing an annual return is determined by the number of certificate of approval holders you employ, or currently contract. The fee is $40.00 per employee (if any) up to a maximum fee of $800.00. Please note that any company officer who works...

3. Court and Tribunal hours – December 2024 and January 2025

   ...most convenient, court where a judge is rostered to sit. Electronically Monitored Bail applications The EM Admin team will be processing the applications throughout the Christmas and holiday period (only being closed on statutory holidays). Applications filed after 2 December (or 9 December in the Youth Court) may be scheduled for hearing from 9 January 2025 subject to hearing time and counsel availability. Please ensure the EM Bail Team is advised of any such adjournments over the holiday peri...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. News

4. [2010] NZEMPC 51 How v Campin & Campin T A Chequers Stud [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...How the sum of $4,134.23 being the award of the Authority together with their calculation of the interest to the date of payment. The challenge [11] The matter of costs before the Authority was then overtaken on 3 September 2009 by Mr How filing a challenge to the determination pursuant to s 179 of the Act. The challenge relates to that part of the determination dealing with refusal to impose a penalty and the quantum of interest. The challenge does not seek a hearing de nov...

5. Ogle - Mangamuka East No.1B No.1B (2015) 103 Taitokerau MB 284 (103 TTK 284) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 103 Taitokerau MB 285 Introduction [1] On 3 July 2013 I dismissed the present application to partition Mangamuka East No. 1 B No. 1 B (“the land”) filed by Rima Ogle, Maude Ryder and Nelson Ogle with reasons to follow in writing. 1 Subsequently, on 16 September 2013 Rima Ogle wrote to the Court to seek a rehearing of the partition application. A formal application for rehearing under...

6. S v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 31 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...Tribunal has concluded it must uphold the complaint, as the material before it establishes those facts, and they amount to systematic and gross breach of the fundamental duties Mr Hakaoro owed to the complainant. The complaint [5] The Registrar filed a statement of complaint, she put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [5.1] The complainant’s visa expired in late 2005; she was accordingly in New Zealand unlawfully from that time. In June 2010, her family...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 21 Haldemann LLC v Nelson [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...and cover letter must be attached in the case of an application to ICC; and that a resumé needs to be attached and information should be provided for “verbal referencing” in the case of recruitment by Enterprise Recruitment. [7] Ms Nelson filed a statement of defence denying the assertions made by Haldeman LLC in its application. She also filed an affidavit deposing that on 17 November 2014 her lawyer emailed counsel who were then acting for the defendants, a copy of the relev...

8. Pilon v Iyengar and C&CDHB [2012] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...application, counsel does not wish to take any further part in this application or proceeding generally. Background [3] The circumstances leading to the first decision of the Tribunal given on 3 February 2011 and also leading to these present proceedings filed on 24 May 2011 are conveniently set out in the first decision of the Tribunal at paras [4] to [11]. [4] The plaintiff’s daughter was born in February 2001. There were complications in the delivery process as a result of which...

9. CAC 20004 v Mr G [2014] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...consent interim non- publication order was made by our Chairperson on 24 June 2014. [3] Mr G has acknowledged his guilt to the matters charged and therefore we formally find the charge dated 28 May 2014 against Mr G proved. 2 [4] Mr G has filed an application for permanent name suppression and an affidavit in support. We are asked to decide this matter on the papers. The Charge [5] The charge reads in full: “READT No 054/14 In the matter of a charge laid under s.91...

10. Penzance v Runcorn LCRO 170 / 2009 (10 February 2010) [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...matter by way of complaint with the New Zealand Law Society. [7] The response of Ms Runcorn was to state that she had no knowledge of those matters complained about by Mr Penzance and that no information of the nature raised was recorded on the file. It was stated that Ms YY had since left the firm (prior to Ms Runcorn commencing work with XX and Co). It was also stated that even if the knowledge did exist it was irrelevant to the matters now before the Court. It was stated that...