Search Results

1. Blayney v Taueki – Ihaia Taueki Trust (2013) 303 Aotea MB 81 (303 AOT 81) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...lands put forward by the Māori Education Trust (‘MET’) in September 2012. Mr Taueki says that this proposal would have doubled the current rental income from the Trust lands. The Evidence [9] Letters of support for the application were filed from Mr Henry Williams, Mr Darryl Blayney and Ms Sheree Waho. Mr Greg Spicer has been accountant to the Trust since 2007. He wrote outlining his concerns about the deterioration of trust meetings over the past financial year. There were...

2. Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v Clarkson [2012] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...the parties were prepared to adopt. [9] As a consequence, at a telephone conference on 7 August 2012, the parties were directed to file a joint memorandum setting out their proposals for consideration by the Tribunal. That memorandum was duly filed on 7 September 2012, and the matter was set down for hearing in Wellington on 6 November 2012. 5 [10] At the hearing of 6 November 2012, the Standards Committee, in accordance with the provisions of the joint memorandum, soug...

3. S v J LCRO 5 / 2008 (13 February 2009) [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...therefore in accordance with s 206(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act this matter is being determined on the material made available to this office by the parties, the Standards Committee and Client S’s son. It is noted that that includes the file or Lawyer J in this matter which was made available to the Standards Committee and provided by it to this office. [19] At the outset it may be useful to note that the primary obligations of Lawyer J were owed to Client S’s son...

4. AM v ZM LCRO 48 / 2010 (25 February 2011) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...appeared on her client‟s behalf to oppose the application. The application was declined by the Court. 2 Complaint [3] The complaint was that the Practitioner had deceived or misled the Court in her submissions of 7 July [200Z], filed in opposition to the Applicant‟s application for interim maintenance, in particular that the Practitioner had submitted that her client was meeting all relationship debt. The Applicant said this information was not correct, and th...

5. [2018] NZLCDT 18 National Standards Committee v Shi [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...earlier in the day, on her behalf. 23. Mr M observed that there was a private client authority and instruction form: (a) Authorising Richard Zhao Lawyers Ltd to effect an electronic transaction in respect of the Eden Crescent Property on the file; and 13 (b) That was signed by both Mr X and Ms J and witnessed by the practitioner, but was undated. 24. Before submitting the documents, Mr M asked the practitioner why the base document was not stated on the authority and in...

6. Direct referral guide for submitters [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...submissions usually outline the evidence that will be called (if any), state the resource management issues of relevance, and state any legal principles that will be relied on. In most cases, the Court will have pre-read all the evidence that has been filed and expects all parties to also have read it. Generally, a witness will take the oath or affirmation, be asked to confirm qualifications (if relevant), and confirm the evidence is true, and then proceed straight to questions on it....

7. [2021] NZEnvC 041 Reid v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 678 KB]

   ...scope of this application. 14 These arguments were not upheld by the Court. Harbour Ridge and the Council submitted that these arguments unnecessarily took up time at the hearing, case management conferences, was the subject of lengthy memoranda filed by Mr Reid, and required the Regional Council to call an additional witness (Mr lremonger) and prepare additional legal submissions to address these issues. [23] The Council also highlighted that Mr Reid bore the burden of proof in thi...

8. E v D [2019] NZIACDT 2 (30 January 2019) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...Ms G emailed Mr D to advise him that her application was ready and she could give it to him in Dunedin or Alexandra. She had asked a named person to check the letter and business plan. 3 [11] Mr D advised Ms G on 7 April 2010 that he had filed the LTBV application two weeks previously. [12] Immigration New Zealand wrote to Ms G on 23 April 2010 advising that she had been granted a visitor’s permit, valid until 30 June 2010. [13] Further documents were sent by Mr D to Imm...

9. Director of Proceedings v Hurst [2019] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 329 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 27 Reference No. HRRT 019/2019 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND PAMELA NELL HURST DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson...

10. MfE-The direct referral process - for submitters [pdf, 389 KB]

    ...submissions usually outline the evidence that will be called (if any), state the resource management issues of relevance, and state any legal principles that will be relied on. In most cases, the Court will have pre-read all the evidence that has been filed and expects all parties to also have read it. Generally, a witness will take the oath or affirmation, be asked to confirm qualifications (if relevant), and confirm the evidence is true, and then proceed straight to questions on it....