Search Results

Search results for Filing.

19427 items matching your search terms

  1. Appellate judgments 2025

    ...related CA matter).SC in first recall, found no grounds for recusal, and regardless leave dismissed (no realistic prospects of success).Now H arguing remaining two judges should not have decided on alleged conflict without considering application to file affidavit.Held: No valid grounds for latest recallAppropriate for two panel judges to decide on recall (no conflicts) Affidavit evidence unnecessary as basis for recusal and case management functions clear from record. Registrar instructed not...

    Located in:
    1. Employment Court >
    2. Judgments >
    3. Appellate court judgments

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 97 Savrim v Wellington Hospitality Group Ltd [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN (Application for leave to adduce further evidence) [1] Ms Savrim has applied for leave to extend time to file a challenge to an Employment Relations Authority (Authority) determination.1 She filed an affidavit in support of her application at the time the application was filed. 1 Savrim v Wellington Hospitality Group Ltd [2019] NZERA 419 (Member MacKinnon). [2] Wellingto...

  3. [2019] NZEmpC 165 New Zealand Compliance and Repairs Ltd v Mistry [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...PERKINS [1] These proceedings involved a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 8 March 2019.1 [2] Following the commencement of proceedings, it was clear that the statement of claim, which was filed by the plaintiff, did not comply with the requirements of reg 11 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000. The plaintiff was accordingly ordered to file an amended statement of claim in compliance with the Regulations, and a time...

  4. Apply to divide relationship property

    ...relationship property if you and your ex-partner can’t agree or if the agreement is unfair or breaks down. You need to apply within 1 year of your divorce or within 3 years from the end of your de facto relationship. You can ask the court for permission to file after this deadline. It costs $798 to apply. If you need help to fill in the forms you can call us or visit your local court Find out more about affidavits and statutory declarations Note: When you print the forms it's important t...

    Located in:
    1. Family >
    2. Separation & divorce >
    3. Divide relationship property

  5. LCRO 89/2024 YL v FV (16 July 2025) [pdf, 307 KB]

    ...applicant engaged the respondent in January 2023 to act for him in care of children and family violence proceedings in which he had previously been self- represented. He had been either directed or prompted by the Court to engage a lawyer and ordered to file updating evidence in the family violence matter by a specified date that allowed him seven and a half weeks to do so. [4] The applicant’s initial enquiry by telephone on 13 January 2023 was referred through a principal of the fir...

  6. LCRO 196/2020 AB v CD (31 March 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...charged for an excessive number of hours worked; and (g) had completed work he had not been specifically instructed to complete; and (h) behaved discourteously to her at a meeting held in Mr CD’s office; and (i) had refused to release his file until fees were paid. [8] In summarising her position, Ms AB submitted that the difficulties that arose with Mr CD’s accounts would not have occurred if Mr CD had informed her of his charging regime at the commencement of the retainer...

  7. [2025] NZEmpC 186 Menzies v Corrigan [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...privilege.2 It suggested that efforts in relation to company documents would be better focused on the liquidator. Regarding the draft challenge to objection to disclosure, the Court noted that it was unusual for a challenge to an objection to be filed where it appeared that no objection had been made, and that the proper application would be a verification order. [7] On 20 March 2025, Mr Anderson, as the plaintiff’s representative, filed a memorandum in response to the Court’...

  8. Hallett - Opawa Rangitoto 2G, 2D2 and 2D3B2 [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 343 (2016 APPEAL 343) [pdf, 239 KB]

    ...which would include his homestead. An order was made by the Court in 1938 and described the boundaries of the newly partitioned Opawa Rangitoto 2D (“the 1938 order”). 3 The area was “estimated to contain 133 acres”. 4 Our reading of the file is that in 1938 the Court relied upon a typographical plan, ML 15656, compiled in 1936. [3] The survey for the partition was not completed until 1950 and it appears that the 1936 topographical plan was not before the surveyor at that...

  9. [2025] NZIACDT 44 – SC v Wharekura (28 August 2025) [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...further letter was sent to him that day identical to the 15 November letter. [16] The letters from Immigration NZ were all addressed to the complainant, but were sent to Mr Wharekura. He did not copy any of them to the complainant. Apart from filing documents on 18 July 2023, he did not reply to Immigration NZ. [17] An email was sent to the agency by Immigration NZ on 5 January 2024 granting a final opportunity to send the requested information. [18] On 22 January 2024, some...