Search Results

1. Matchitt v Butler - Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust (2016) 154 Waiariki MB 261 (154 WAR 261) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...Pono Leagal Ltd, 1222 Eruera St, P O Box 1693, Rotorua 3040 C M Bidois, East Brewster Ltd, 1137 Pukuatua St, P O Box 1742 Rotorua, DX JP 30017 154 Waiāriki MB 262 Introduction [1] On 16 November 2016, Eddie Matchitt and Stephen Frires filed an application seeking orders under ss 231, 236, 237, 238, 240 and 242 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act) to restrain the trustees of the Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust (the Trust) from taking any further steps until a revi...

2. Walker - Kourateuwhi 2E1A1 (2016) 57 Tairawhiti MB 157 (57 TRW 157) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...will of Rehia Henare equally in favour of: 10 (a) Eliza Raiha Walker (daughter) (b) George Walker (grandson) Further Title Issues [15] On 1 November 1999, the Court heard an application for an occupation order under s 328 of the 1993 Act, filed on behalf of Ned Wharehinga. 11 The Court granted the application upon the grounds that it was satisfied that notice requirements had been addressed, that the owners had sufficient time to discuss and consider the matter, that there...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 096 Findlay v Waipa District Council [pdf, 507 KB]

   ...having succeeded in resolving most of the issues in the appeal, two matters remained that were not strictly within its jurisdiction, but which the original parties were keen to include in overall resolution. [5] In August 2016, the Respondent filed a Memorandum seeking directions under s 293 of the RMA in relation to those matters, being the Transfer Rule and the Intersection Rule. [6] Subsequently, and pursuant to directions from the Court, the Respondent prepared and notified c...

4. Benjamin v Smith - Te Puna 154D3B2B (2005) 81 Tauranga MB 175 (81 T 175) [pdf, 715 KB]

   ...by extending the area of occupation to encompass 2438 square metres. Rina Benjamin represented by Mr Armstrong Respondents: Daryl Smith and Dora Lee Smith represented by Ms Patuawa and with her Miss Rewiti The Applications The applicant has filed three applications as outlined above. Each application affects the respondents. The first, for an injunction has been settled. The respondents, have by memorandum filed in the Court, agreed that the interim order made by the Court may n...

5. General Standards Committee 2 v Baker and Yoon [2019] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...on 12 May 2017 without disclosing the irregular payment. 6 [17] Unfortunately, the sale in question did not proceed and the funds therefore were unable to be replaced. This created a dilemma, as perceived by Mr Yoon, of continuing to file false certificates while the funds remained unaccounted for, or confess that he had filed a false certificate deliberately for April 2017. [18] He made the wrong decision to continue making false certificates and eventually borrowed funds...

6. LCRO 195/2018 KW v LQ (26 June 2020) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...application for review Timeliness [32] The Standards Committee determination is dated 28 August 2018. [33] The application for review was received at this Office on 16 October 2018. [34] LQ questioned whether the application for review had been filed in accordance with the requirements imposed by s 198 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. Section 198(b) states that every application for review must be lodged within 30 working days after a copy of the notice of determinatio...

7. LCRO 183/2016 TA v CIB LIMITED (28 March 2019) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...and awarded under s 156(1)(b) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [16] Following issuing a notice of hearing on 11 February 2016 which identified the issues that the Committee was intending to address, Mr TA, through his counsel, filed further submissions. To the extent that those submissions traversed new matters, it was submitted for Mr TA that: a. Mr TA had specific instructions to prepare the agreement on a GST inclusive basis; and 4 b. a failure to comp...

8. Raukawa v Lux - Opape 3A No 1E (2019) 210 Waiāriki MB 114 (210 WAR 114) [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...the papakāinga reservation by consent. He then ordered a meeting of beneficiaries for redefining the beneficiary class in relation to the marae and marae extension, and for an election of trustees. The Judge directed that applications should be filed for the redefinition of the beneficiary class, the appointment of trustees and for the combining of the marae extension to one Māori reservation. He also confirmed orders acknowledging the resignation of Ms Lux and Daniel Lux. Th...

9. Pirini v Ure - Oakura Pa (2020) 425 Aotea MB 237 (425 AOT 237) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...current trustees are Keith Manukonga, Kenneth Hau, Sharon Steen, Carol Koha, Mike Ure, Errol Ruakere, Matthew Ruakere, Tari Norris and Emily Ngaia.5 Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural history [8] As foreshadowed, the application was filed on 2 July 2019 seeking the removal of Mr Ure as a trustee on the grounds of inappropriate behaviour not becoming of a trustee of 1 204 Aotea MB 192, 5 May 2008 (204 AOT 192) 2 Vol 16 folio 61, LTO reference 508944 3 New Zealan...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 54 Bennett v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 279 KB]

    ...an investigation meeting for 1 June had been issued. [12] On 3 June 2016, the Authority support officer forwarded to Ms Davidson various documents that had passed between the Authority and Mr Bennett, including a witness statement that had been filed in Ms Davidson’s name in April 2016. Ms Davidson replied later that day, advising the Authority that she had not seen her witness statement before it was lodged and that “some of the statement is incorrect”. [13] The investiga...