Search Results

1. [2018] NZSSAA 44 (14 September 2018) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...decision under appeal. The appellant therefore sought clarification as to whether he needed to comply with the directions issued on 28 May 2018. [6] A telephone conference was convened on 13 June 2018. Prior to the conference, both parties filed further submissions. At this conference, Ms Siueva confirmed that the Ministry had decided to defer the date of deduction of the appellant’s wife’s UKP from the appellant’s SLP/carer to 17 May 2017 and disestablish the debt of $...

2. [2022] NZACC 103 - Renton v ACC (31 May 2022) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...[9] In 2006 Mr Renton consulted his present counsel, and further medical opinion was sought as to the likely nature of Mr Renton’s medical condition on 4 March 1997, as seen by Professor Bishara. On 21 September 2006, a Notice of Appeal was filed against the review decision, some three years out of time. The Notice alleged that Professor Bishara had failed to provide the standard of care reasonably expected of a Neurosurgeon. [10] On 15 November 2010, a decision was issued by J...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 056 Waikanae Land Company Limited v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...before tl1e Court by way of direct referral from Kapiti Coast District Council (the Council) enabling it to "catch up" with tl1e appeal 3 on the Heritage matter and have the two determined together. The direct referral application was filed on 13 June 2022. [2] It is immediately apparent on reading the various documents filed in the Court in connection with both proceedings that there is a substantive and seemingly determinative factual matter at issue between \'v...

4. Director of Proceedings v Ramsden [2022] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...Proceedings v Ramsden [2022] NZHRRT 25. Note publication restrictions.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 25 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 3 May 2022. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A statement of claim dated 3 May 2022. [2.2] A con...

5. [2022] NZACC 112-Dixon v Accident Compensation Corporation (14 June 2022) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...patella unspecified. 2 Background [2] Ms Dixon was born in 1988. She worked as a hairdresser. [3] On 8 February 2020, Ms Dixon was lifting weights at a gym when she suffered an injury. [4] On 13 February 2020, an ACC injury claim form was filed, noting that Ms Dixon pulled a muscle in her left leg. The diagnoses were a gastrocnemius (calf) sprain and an injury/muscle and tendon/lower leg level, both injuries said to have occurred on 8 February 2020. [5] Ms Dixon recei...

6. [2021] NZACC 91 - Razek v ACC (29 June 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...There is then, according to the appellant’s narrative, an unexplained gap of time until January 2002 when the appellant says that he completed and handed over at the ACC office what was inferentially a claim form for diabetes. [62] From ACC’s file notes, what was plainly uppermost in Ms Barratt’s mind at the time of the meeting with the appellant on 31 January 2002 was assessment of his back injury. [63] Also, she makes the comment: Osama then mentioned his liver functio...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Kennelly [2022] NZLCDT 31 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...with the knowledge that his father was being manipulated as he continues to be by Mr P. … This guy is a classic bully, manipulator, liar and a narcissist. … What should have been of note to the Complaints Committee is that before he filed anything with the Family Court he filed a complaint against me in a misguided attempt to intimidate and bully me. Given I have never been bullied in my life and those that know me well know exactly how much I detest and despise bullies and...

8. XD Ltd v QC [2023] NZDT 607 (7 November 2023) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have...

9. H Ltd v MN & KN [2023] NZDT 656 (8 November 2023) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have...

10. Estate of Pene-Ellis v Accident Compensation Corporation (Entitlements) [2022] NZACC 214 [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...accepted cover the following treatment injury: “Misplacement of internal jugular line and common carotid artery and aortic root, requiring sternotomy, with removal of intravenous line penetrating aortic root side right”. [8] On 5 August 2016, a file note records that Ms Pene-Ellis’ advocate contacted the Corporation and it was agreed and acknowledged by the branch support manager that: Once Mihi is released, we can send one of our assessors to her property to assess her needs....