Search Results

1. Tai Rakena v Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...Tai Rakena participated in a first case management teleconference. In the course of that conference a case management timetable was agreed to and set. Details are to be found in the Minute issued on that date. [5] On 19 May 2017 Mr Tai Rakena filed a document described as “Comprehensive Statement of Claim, s 66 of the Act” which was accompanied by 12 pages of documents. This statement was treated as his statement of evidence and exhibits in support of his claim. [6] On 3 Novemb...

2. Re Tai Rakena (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2017] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...DECISION OF TRIBUNAL THAT INTENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING1 Introduction [1] Mr Tai Rakena is currently serving a sentence of imprisonment at Whanganui Prison. He is due for release is August 2017. [2] To date he has filed two proceedings with the Tribunal (HRRT058/2016 and HRRT011/2017) and has now presented for filing an intended third set of proceedings. In this decision we address those third intended proceedings which will be referred to as HRRT025/2...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 163 Bay of Plenty DHB v Cliff [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...legislation. 2 Rather an application to extend time is required. In that case Judge Couch was prepared to treat the application as one seeking an order of the Court pursuant to s 219 of the Employment Relations Act 2000, extending the time for filing a statement of claim necessary to commence a challenge. I approach the present application in the same way. 1 Cliff v The Bay Of Plenty District Health Board [2015] NZERA Aucklan...

4. [2019] NZREADT 39 - Feschiev - Ruling [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...Respondent AND NICOLA CRUICKSHANK and TOMMY’S REAL ESTATE LIMITED WELLINGTON Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Mr J Doogue (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions filed by: Mr Feschiev, Appellant Ms E Woolley, on behalf of the Authority Ms S Baigent, on behalf of Ms Cruickshank and Tommy’s Real Estate Limited Wellington Date of Ruling: 9 September 2019 ___________________...

5. DW and AW v EQC and State Insurance [2019] CEIT-2019-0001 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...against the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and State Insurance, a business division of IAG New Zealand Ltd. The next day the application was served electronically on both respondents advising each that, if they wished to oppose the application, they must file their response with the Tribunal and serve it upon DW and AW within 15 working days. [2] Each respondent, therefore, has until 17 July 2019 to file their response and supporting documentation. EQC has not yet taken any formal step...

6. [2009] NZEmpC AC 50/09 Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort (2000) Ltd v Unsworth [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) in Wellington. The Authority returned the papers to Mr Unsworth without having recorded them as accepted for filing. The basis for this was that the documents were not correctly completed and were not filed with the correct office of the Authority, that being Auckland. The Support Officer at the Wellington office also advised Mr Unsworth that he should seek legal advice and suggested that he contact his local Community Law...

7. [2009] NZEmpC AC 13/09 Taylor v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 19 KB]

   ...it failed to comply with the Employment Court Regulations 2000. To avoid prejudice to the plaintiff because of the inadequate pleadings, I gave him 14 days to file a statement of claim that complied with the Regulations. Instead the plaintiff filed a notice discontinuing his challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority. In my interlocutory judgment, I found that the defendant was entitled to the costs to date and reserved them to be addressed by way of mem...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 19 Waste Management New Zealand Ltd v Jones [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 19 EMPC 436/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to extend time to file a statement of defence BETWEEN WASTE MANAGEMENT NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND BRIDGET JONES Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: D Erickson, counsel for plaintiff M McDonald,...

9. [2008] NZEmpC WC 10/08 Monteith v Eagle [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...the 28-day time period for challenging a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. The determination was given on 25 July 2007 (WA 103/07). Mrs Monteith attempted to file a challenge on 6 September 2007, which was 15 days late. She filed an application for extension of time on 5 October 2007. Sequence of events [2] The employment relationship between the parties began in January 2006 and ended on 22 September 2006 when Mrs Monteith dismissed Ms Eagle. [3] Ms Eagle...

10. LCRO 99/2017 WH v Area SC [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr WH has applied for a review of a decision by the Area Standards Committee X to take no further action following its own motion inquiry into difficulties with the secure retention of client files after the partnership between Mr WH and Mr BZ had come to an end. [2] Although the Committee was concerned that inadequacies in long-term storage arrangements may compromise client confidentiality, it considered it was not appropr...