19427 items matching your search terms
...Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for adjournment of hearing BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By written submissions filed on 7, 9 and 10 July 2015 Appearances: MW O'Brien and B Nicholson, counsel for plaintiff J Douglas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 15 July 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 11) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN...
...CHRISTOPHER ADAMS JOSEPH WARD: 3435 State Highway 5, Te Pohue, Napier ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Christopher Adams is the owner of a leaky home. On 25 August 2011 he filed an application for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing. Both the assessor and the chief executive concluded that the claim was not an eligible claim because it was not filed within ten years of when...
...valid windows installer package”? The problem here may be that your download was interrupted and you have not been able to download the full installation package. You can check this by clicking on the icon you have added to your desktop. If the file size (shown in the yellow box) is smaller than 1MB, this will almost certainly be the issue. Try the following: 1. Close Word 2. Return to the download page 3. Re-enter your details and select 'Download' 4. Instead of Saving...
...IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a notice of opposition to the application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN SUNCORP NEW ZEALAND EMPLOYEES LIMITED Plaintiff AND ANDREW TIMMS Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: JM...
...on a non-de novo basis. Because it did not file its challenge within time, for reasons I will return to, it is required to apply for leave to extend the time for doing so.2 The three respondents oppose the grant of leave. [3] The parties have filed material in support of their respective positions and agreed that the matter could be dealt with on the papers. Framework for analysis [4] The approach to applications of this sort is not in dispute. It can be summarised as follows....
...(shown in blue in Appendix A): a) Steps to be completed by 17 July 2018: 1 Paragraph 13(d) of the Decision. 3 (i) A table listing section 274 parties’ topics and sub-topics to be filed and served by the Applicant, including a brief statement of the Applicant’s and Council’s respective positions on those topics; (ii) The filing of this case management memorandum; b) Council is to provide a brief update on...
..._________________________________________________________________ A: The Applicant’s declaration is allowed. Declarations could be issued broadly in 2 the terms outlined below: (a) an application for extension of a lapse date under s125(1A)(b) must be filed prior to the lapse date. Failure to do so is fatal to any jurisdiction under the Act; (b) where such an application is made, the processing of that application, any objections and appeals are matters that are de...
...denoted more than a temporary inability to provide services competently. It was not appropriate to frame the absence of arrangements to hand files to another licensed adviser as a separate breach of cl 1. Rather, there was one breach, namely not filing the application in time. [29] Equally, according to counsel, there was no basis to the allegation that Ms Ramos failed to be honest by not advising the complainant she was unwell. The reason the application was not filed was that...
...that the application for removal should be struck out. The trustees need to answer questions concerning their activities and the annual accounts. For example, clause 7 (c) (i) of the current trust order requires that the accounts be audited and filed with the Registrar within six months of the balance date if the trust’s income exceeds 4 Refer 60 Tākitimu MB 223 (60 TKT 223) 81 Takitimu MB 56 $10,000. The only excepti...
...consult. [21] Mr GY provided a brief response on 20 August 2020. That response did not reference any information from the lawyer that Mr GY had intended to consult. His submission essentially reinforced argument advanced when the complaint was filed, that [Law firm]’s apportionment of tasks amongst a multitude of authors had likely contributed to inefficiencies and an escalation in costs. [22] The Standards Committee delivered its decision on 15 September 2020. [23] The Commit...