Search Results

1. Khan v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 45 (24 April 2015) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...unprofessionally in lodging an expression of interest when she knew it claimed points her client was not entitled to claim. [7] The Tribunal rejected Ms Khetarpal’s explanation, and concluded she did not exercise due care and professionalism and filed a defective expression of interest for that reason. It accordingly upheld the complaint. The complaint [8] The Registrar filed a statement of complaint, she put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [8.1] T...

2. Rafiq v Department of Internal Affairs [2013] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...chronology is not exhaustive. [5] On 10 December 2007 the Department received from Mr Rafiq an application for New Zealand citizenship. Almost immediately, on 7 January 2008, he made a request under the Privacy Act 1993 for a full copy of his citizenship file. At that time it contained only the documents filed by Mr Rafiq. The requested documents were provided. None were withheld. On 11 February 2008 Mr Rafiq changed his name by statutory declaration to Rayshane Mallan. He did not...

3. Doney - Lot 2 DP 29547 (2017) 145 Taitokerau MB 4 (145 TTK 4) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...[4] On 20 December 2016, Lot 2 was transferred to Craig Lewis, Theresa Robinson, and Far North Trustee Services 2006 Limited, by way of mortgagee sale. Despite that, Ms Doney remained in occupation of the property. [5] The new proprietors filed proceedings before the Tenancy Tribunal to remove Ms Doney from Lot 2. That application was heard by the Tenancy Tribunal on 9 February 2017 at 3:20pm. [6] Due to the pending hearing before the Tenancy Tribunal, per r 9.6(3) of the Māo...

4. Karena - Whangauru Whakaturia 1D6B9A, 1D6B9B, 1D6B9C and 1D6B9D (2005) 102 Whangārei MB 190 (102 WH 190) [pdf, 514 KB]

   ...D6B9D to General land The Applicant Wero Karena and his children Yvonne, Jessica and Tamaar each own sections with an area of 800m2 described respectively as Whangaruru-Whakaturia 106B9A, 106B9B, 106B9C and 106B90. On 30 November 2001, the Applicant filed an application to vest all 4 sections in an ahu whenua trust pursuant to s.215/93. When that application came to Court, one of the daughters objected. On 08 July 2002, Mr Karena filed the application currently before the Court. The d...

5. Miller v REAA & Robinson [2013] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...disappointed to note that the consumer was served with papers threatening legal action prior to any serious attempts on the part of the companies to resolve the issue using industry protocols.” [7] In relation to an allegation that the licensee removed files from the appellant, the Committee found that: “4.9 The Committee considered the matter of the removal and subsequent return of files from the complainant’s premises to be an employment issue which is not a matter to be teste...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 132 Jesus 2016 Company Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Jesus (2016) Company Limited Date of Decision : 16 August 2017 Date of Issue: 21 August 2017 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The application by Jesus (2016) Company Limited is struck out. B: Costs are reserved and any application is to be filed within 10 working days; any reply from the company, if any, is to be filed five working days thereafter. REASONS I ntrod uction [1] An application for the change and/or cancellation of enforcement orders was filed on was filed on...

7. Criminal Cases Review Commission

   Criminal Cases Review Commission The Commission is an independent Crown Entity governed by a Board of Commissioners. It employs specialist staff with the mandate to investigate possible miscarriages of justice. The Commission can refer a case back to the appeal court when it considers a miscarriage of justice may have occurred. This function replaces the referral function formerly performed by the Governor-General when people applied for the exercise of the Royal prerogative of mercy. The Commis

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives >
   3. Key initiatives archive

8. Level three Protocol - Akl - Mar 2021 [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...email to seek an extension of time. Mediation and expert conferences 6. Any mediations or expert conferences that proceed during this period will be conducted by audio-visual link or telephone. Filing of documents 7. Court documents may be filed by post or by email. Court documents cannot be filed in person at the Court Registry. The processing of any documents filed by post may be delayed. 8. A general waiver suspending the requirement to file paper originals and copies...

9. LVT Level three Protocol (AKL - 1 March 21) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Hearings 3. Any hearings that proceed during this period will be conducted by audio-visual link or telephone. 4. Special arrangements will be made for urgent hearings, if required. 5. The Tribunal will be flexible with its procedures and filing deadlines. If deadlines are not able to be met, contact should be made with the registry by email to seek an extension of time. Filing of documents 6. Documents may be filed by post or by email. Documents cannot be filed in perso...

10. Level three Protocol - Akl - Feb 2021 [pdf, 114 KB]

    ...email to seek an extension of time. Mediation and expert conferences 6. Any mediations or expert conferences that proceed during this period will be conducted by audio-visual link or telephone. Filing of documents 7. Court documents may be filed by post or by email. Court documents cannot be filed in person at the Court Registry. The processing of any documents filed by post may be delayed. 8. A general waiver suspending the requirement to file paper originals and copies...