18490 items matching your search terms
...and a confirmation that there is no issue as to costs. [11] That being the case, I confirm I will not be considering and issuing a formal judgment with regard to the plaintiffs’ claims and the defendants’ opposition to those. [12] The file in relation to this proceeding is accordingly closed. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 1.55 pm on 17 August 2021
...(ENV-2020-AKL-188) Appellant AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick, sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Hearing: On the Papers Last case event: Joint Memorandum of Counsel, filed 10 September 2021 Appearances: S Ongley for the Appellant A Hopkinson for the Respondent Date of Decision: 14 September 2021 Date of Issue: 14 September 2021 DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Under s 279(1)...
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 10 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Non-Fixed Fee Legal aid file No. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Details of claim Forum category 1 2 3 4 Type of proceedings this invoice covers: Covers period from: to Interim invoice Final invoice Lead Provider...
...by \v'aka Kotahi, notwithstanding it's understandable wish to have this matter dealt with as speedily as can be reasonably achieved; • The request for mediation processes to commence within five working days of anticipated s 27 4 filing date does not, in my view, give enough time for s 27 4 parties to consider all other 27 4 notices which might be filed, identify areas of common interest, instruct advisors/ counsel and adequately prepare for mediation; • It is not...
...at Whangarei) Whakataunga: Judgment date 11 December 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ TKTAR WILLIAMS Judgment of Judge TKTAR Williams 267 Taitokerau MB 125 [1] Malcolm Bruce Paterson filed an application alleging that the trustees of Ngā Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust (“the Trust”) acted in breach of their trust deed and applied to require the Trust to report to the Court on its administration and perfo...
...serious attempt to sell the land as the owner of the Land, PMR has demonstrated that it meets the test in s 185(3) of the Act. PMR is therefore entitled to the order sought. Agreement reached between the parties [6] Since the Application was filed, Auckland Transport has considered the evidence filed in support and does not oppose the order sought. [7] The parties agree that each party will meet its own costs. 3 Consideration [8] The Court has read and considered the app...
...APPLICATION FOR STAY _______________________________________________________________ A: The application for a stay of the abatement notices is granted. B: The abatement notices are stayed pending determination of a retrospective resource consent filed in respect of the non-complying parts of the fence or until Monday 30 September 2024, whichever date is the earliest. 2 C: Auckland Council is to file a reporting memorandum as to the progress of the resource consent applicatio...
...as at 1 June 2021 is as follows: (a) Capital Value: $825,000; (b) Land Value: $540,000; (c) Value of Improvements: $285,000. B: There is no order as to costs. 2 REASONS Introduction This determination relates to an objection filed by Louise Boyd to a valuation adopted by Auckland Council in relation to the property at 16A Chilcott Road, Henderson, Auckland under the Rating Valuations Act 1998. The parties have now resolved the objection by agreeing to a new rati...
...subsequently developed into psychosis. Police consider Mr Uaisele needs to show he is getting the support he requires and is mentally fit to work in security if he wants to retain his certificate. [2] Mr Uaisele did not attend the hearing, but he filed written responses to the complaint. He denies that he has schizophrenia and says the judges and psychiatrists in Australia are organised crime families. He says the hospital system is heavily corrupted and a platform for extortion...
...to the verification order. Further, indemnity costs reflect a party’s actual costs. Based on the evidence before the Court I am not satisfied that the amount sought is reflective of Mr Cunningham’s actual costs. [4] Mr Cunningham did not file a notice of opposition or any other documentation in relation to the application for urgency. Therefore, under the guideline scale, he is only entitled to scale costs of 0.25 days for his appearance at the hearing of the application....