Search Results

1. Hoko - Papamoa 2A1 (2001) 68 Tauranga MB 96 (68 T 96) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...1993 ApPEARANCES: DECISION: Arapeta Hoko - Applicant Des Kahotea - to oppose Mr Webster as Solicitor for the Trustees of Papamoa 2B Btock The applicanl, Arapeta Hoko, is the sole owner of Papamoa 2A1 Block comprising 1.0583 hectares. He filed his application on 20 October 2000. The application was filed after an application had been granted 10 partition Papamoa 2A inlo Papamoa 2A 1 and 2A2 Blocks and indicated in Its grounds - " If the Partition Order and the Vesling Ord...

2. Kaire - Ngararatunua A2B3 (2007) 118 Whangarei MB 123 (118 WH 123) [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...owners. ---Amalgamation and Roadway or Easement-Orders [22] The applicant has not separately sought amalgamation ofNgararatunua A2B2 and Ngararatunua A2B3B, however that is implicit in the proposed partition plan. Also, the applicant has not filed a separate application for either roadway or right of way easement orders in respect of the right of way to provide access for N gararatunua A2B3A and Ngararatunua A2B3C. It would seem that a right of way is intended. The owners need to...

3. McGregor v Central Hawkes Bay District Council - Te Paerahi 1D2 and 1D3E (2007) 190 Napier MB 58 (190 NA 58) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...assessment to past use and enjoyment of the land directed at 183 Napier MB 16. Given that this application is for compensation, my focus is limited to the second assessment, using the first only as context. 59 190 Napier MB 60 [9] The Council filed the third assessment by Mr Kitchin dated 1 June 2006 which differs fi'om Mr Mollison's second assessment. The Council submit that Mr Kitchin's assessment should be preferred for the reasons set out under that heading...

4. Luke v Grey - Wairau Block XII Sections A1 and F and Block XII Cloudy Bay Survey District Sections 20, 22 and 24 (2019) 53 Te Waipounamu MB 187 (53 TWP 187) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...conducted at the hui is subject to confirmation from the Māori Land Court. Mr Thomas submits that no opposition or concerns were voiced at the hui and the only concerns he has since learned of are those of the respondents. Opposition [13] Mr Grey filed in opposition to the application as he had concerns about the process followed by the applicants. At the hearing, his daughter spoke on his behalf. Ms Grey- Schumacher submits that the method of advertising the hui was insufficient...

5. Memorandum of Counsel re Hearing Arrangements 5 September 2018 [pdf, 754 KB]

   ...COURT’S MINUTE ON ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE HEARING Dated 5 September 2018 Director Aidan Warren aidan.warren@mccawlewis.co.nz TU-447097-3-1550-V8:TKB 2 MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT 1. This Memorandum of Counsel is filed on behalf of Mana Whenua in opposition, in response to the Court’s Minute on Arrangements for the Hearing, dated 31 August 2018 (“the Court’s Minute”). Parties were invited to respond to the Court’s Minute. 2. Counsel addr...

6. Priestly v Tawa - Tuaropaki A (2018) 191 Waiariki MB 234 (191 WAR 234) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...the Mokai Marae trust. Marilyn is not a trustee of that trust. She has advised that she was a member of the Committee between 2009 and 2013. I note also that Ms Khan is a current trustee of the Waihaha Māori Lands Trust. The application as filed does not seek her removal from that trust. 3 184 Waiariki MB 220-224 (184 WAR 220-224). 4 327 Rotorua MB 180-184 (327 ROT 180-184). 5 Rameka v Hall [2013] NZCA 203; and Apatu v Puna...

7. Guidelines - How to make an appeal [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...appellant, it must do so using the method best suited to the appellant’s circumstances. [8] LODGING OF REGULATION 249 REPORT 8.1. The regulation 249 report sets out MSD’s reasons for its decision. 8.2. The Authority will give MSD a date for filing its regulation 249 report in response to the appeal. MSD may provide the regulation 249 report at the same time as the relevant documents referred to in clause [7] above, if it is more practical for the parties to do so. 8.3. The...

8. Adults convicted and sentenced data notes and trends December 2019 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...204,341 charges for adults (counting each charge individually). This decreased by 2% (3,897 charges) compared to 2018. From 1 July 2019, 17-year olds became part of the youth justice system. This means the 369 finalised charges for 17-year olds filed from July 2019 onwards are not included in these adult statistics.2 This change is too small to account for the 2% drop in adult charges. In 2019, 70,944 adults were charged with at least one offence (Figure 1).4 This is 2,595 (...

9. [2020] NZIACDT 26 - UO v Nukulasi (23 June 2020) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...restrictive penalty appropriate in the circumstances; and (h) looked at overall, is the penalty which is fair, reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. DISCUSSION [23] There was an extraordinary and inexplicable delay of one year to filing the s 61 request with the Minister’s office. Time was of the essence as the complainant was unlawfully in New Zealand. Ms Nukulasi accepts her conduct was unprofessional. [24] I do not find the Elizabeth decision to be applicable,...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 124 Spotless Facility Services v Mackay [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment deals with an objection lodged by Spotless Facility Services NZ Limited (Spotless) in respect to parts of Ms Anne MacKay’s brief of evidence. That brief has been filed for the purposes of an upcoming substantive fixture which will consider a non de novo challenge of a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 Spotless challenges one aspect of the Authority’s liability f...