Search Results

1. Nairn v Peebles LCRO 109 / 2010 (14 December 2010) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...purchaser‟s lawyer on 23 June had “highlighted the issue”. Practitioner’s clarification at the review [12] The review hearing appeared to have assisted the Practitioner‟s recollection in the matter. After a closer examination of his file he modified his earlier evidence, and now accepted that there had been no telephone discussion with the Applicant at the earlier time, concerning the title or the oral agreement with the purchaser. This accorded with the Applicant‟s...

2. Kopa v Cooper - Motatau 2 Section 23A1A Block [2010] 2010 Māori Appellate Court MB 243 (2010 APPEAL 243) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...hectares being the land surrounding the dwelling, and being an area which the appellant had developed and looked after through the years. 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 245 Notice of Appeal from Preliminary Determination [9] The appellant filed a notice of appeal from the preliminary determination through counsel. In summary the grounds of appeal are that the Court failed to consider the extensive repairs and improvements carried out by the appellant, preferring to rely upo...

3. UX v OC LCRO 81 / 2012 (29 April 2013) [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...Committee decision, but also considering the way that the Standards Committee dealt with the complaint. The process includes a fresh consideration of the original complaint, and I have considered all of the information on the Standards Committee file and that arising in the course of the review. It was helpful to have heard from the parties at the review hearing. I will deal with the three main complaints under the headings previously mentioned. Letter of Engagement 3...

4. Brichris Holdings Limited v Irmac Builders Limited (in liquidation) [2012] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...apprenticeship training continued with Irmac Builders Limited until terminated on 13 June 2001, after completion of construction of the concerned dwellings. [13] The relevant factual matrix was clearly set down by Mr Neilson in his affidavit filed in support of his removal application. That affidavit deposed that Mr Neilson was during the entire construction period only a trainee carpentry apprentice engaged by Irmac Builders Limited and that at all relevant times was under th...

5. Hawe - Waiaua B (2010) 5 Taitokerau MB 191 (5 TTK 191) [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...already built on the basis of that area and I see no value in disturbing the status quo. Ken Wells [15] It would also be appropriate to amend the order in favour of Ken Wells to reflect the correct site that he is on. I will only do so if he files written consent to that amendment. I will issue a direction in that regard. Helen Blake [16] It is also appropriate to cancel the occupation order of Helen Blake, if that is her wish. I will also issue a direction in that regard....

6. [2016] NZEmpC 71 Marx v Southern Cross Campus Board of Trustees [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] Mrs Marx was employed as a Resource Teacher, Learning and Behaviour with the Southern Cross Campus in 2012. She was suspended on 29 January 2013 and later dismissed by way of letter dated 7 May 2013. Mrs Marx filed a claim in the Employment Relations Authority, alleging that she had been unjustifiably dismissed, disadvantaged and discriminated against in her employment. Mrs Marx also sought a penalty for breach of good faith. The defenda...

7. BD v EG LCRO 107/2012 (26 Aug 2015) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...services arising from or in respect of these matters. [3] Mr EG’s position is that Ms BD’s instructions called for him to prepare a completely new will. His position is consistent with the terms of engagement Ms BD signed, as well as Mr EG’s file notes, and the correspondence he wrote at the time. [4] On 14 July 2011 Mr EG’s file note says that Ms BD had come to see him because she “would like to make specific changes to her will”. His note records the results of ti...

8. Muneez v Deng [2013] NZIACDT 33 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...Date Issued: 27 May 2013 2 DECISION Introduction [1] Ms Deng is a licensed immigration adviser who Mr Muneez engaged. [2] Mr Muneez had lodged an expression of interest himself. Ms Deng was engaged to assist with the filing of an application for residence for Mr Muneez and his family. [3] There was a question as to whether Ms Deng adequately evaluated the case for applying for residence when lodging the application. [4] After the application was lodged, Ms...

9. The Proprietors of Potikirua Incorporation - Part Te Piki 2 (2008) 103 Opotiki MB 17 (103 OPO 17) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...venue in the newspaper. [4] I also directed that I needed a copy of the Minutes containing the resolution passed by the owners to authorise this sale. A copy of the Annual General Meeting Minutes of the Incorporation dated 25 February 2006 was filed with the Maori Land Court on 5 September 2007. Those minutes indicate that the following motion was put to the meeting: (a) That Potikirua Incorporation sell the Land area of 3025 square meters at valuation to Whakaari Beekeepers Limite...

10. Couper v Rangipunga - Parihaka X Trust (2008) 212 Aotea MB 38 (212 AOT 38) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...Rukuwai the secretary, acknowledged what the affected trustees had to say and encouraged them to work co-operatively to dispose of any outstanding issues that might remain unresolved. Ownership of buildings [10] Mr Rangipunga had previously filed an application regarding the ownership of certain buildings on trust land. He stated that when the decision to file was made, the trustees were unanimous in supporting him. It was claimed that a group known as the Parihaka Peace Festiva...