18840 items matching your search terms
...(Deceased) DEPUTY REGISTRAR Applicant Judgment: 20 October 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 870 Introduction [1] This application filed by a Deputy Registrar, of the Māori Land Court in Whangarei, (“the applicant”) pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”) seeks to amend a determination order dated 8 August 1997 at 84 Whangarei MB 158 re...
...Parore’s conduct in the course of marketing a property in Grafton, Auckland (“the property”). The Committee issued its penalty decision (in respect of the complaint it had upheld) on 30 August 2017 (“the penalty decision”).2 [2] Mr Liu filed a Notice of Appeal in the Tribunal on 22 September 2017. The Tribunal understands that the appeal is against both of the Committee’s decisions. [3] Mr Liu also made complaints against Barfoot & Thompson (“the Agency”) with...
...for the Standards Committee Respondent is Self-Represented 2 DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] This set of charges has had a protracted, and at times, challenging path to resolution. The original six charges were filed in January 2018. After a number of adjournments, granted because of the practitioner’s health, or in order for criminal charges to be finally resolved, the matter came before the Tribunal on 23 July 2020. [2] Although his job was ma...
...believed he would have combined strengths in business advisory, farming and IT from which the company would benefit. 2. On 6 October 2019, after one meeting of the advisory board, MW resigned from his role as an advisory board member. 3. MW has filed a claim seeking $15,000.00 in fees for work done for the company between August and October 2018. 4. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Was there a contract between the parties? (b) Was the contract for the advisory boar...
...northern boundary is the Mangamuka River. It would appear that its primary use is as a papakainga. History of Application [6] The application has been before the Court since 2003 and its history requires some explanation. [7] The application was filed on 23 April 2003. It was initially heard on 20 June 2003 at Kaikohe and was adjourned at the request of some of the owners. The Court then conducted a site inspection on 1 September 2003. However, the site inspection was cut short as ce...
...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY [1] Paula Werohia-Lloyd seeks an occupation order to enable her mother, Katarina Werohia (nee Leef) and her family to reside on the block known as Raropua being Te Puna Parish of Lot 154A No 2. The application was filed on the 21 8t July 2005 and was originally heard as an unadvertised application on the 28th July 2005. At that hearing the Court gave directions for the holding of a meeting of owners which took place on the 318t August 2005. The matter...
...HEMOATA BAYNE Applicant Judgment: 22 August 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 765 Introduction [1] This application filed by Erana Hemoata Bayne (“the applicant”), pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”), seeks to amend evidence presented to the Court that lead to orders dated 23 February 1998 at 25 Auckland MB 212-242 in r...
...still involved in Ms UV at some level. Once Mr MP was suspended he could no longer act for a client or have an instructing solicitor. Mr DL could have insisted on Mr MP providing a comprehensive briefing note, as a condition of taking over the file. If the handover of Ms UV’s matter had been properly managed, Mr MP should have been relieved of any and all further involvement. [24] There is clear evidence that Mr DL was engaged in correspondence with Mr MP in the lead up to th...
...be given in writing later. They accepted that was the best option for them and I announced that the application was dismissed. This is the judgment that was reserved giving those reasons. Minute Book: 283 ROT 265 The application was first filed in April 2003. It was amended, expanded and explained in a series of pre-trial conferences. At a late stage, Sir Howard indicated that he acted not just for himself but for many others. The application was supported by more than 10°A&g...
...the settlement that was made it is apparent that while the various tupuna were put on the tiUe it was never intended that they be regarded as absolute owners and subject to rights of succession. The original claim to the Waitangi Tribunal was filed by Josephine Anderson on behalf of the hapu of Ruapuha on 3 February 1988. This was superseded by a later mare explicit claim filed on 14 July 1989, Part of the relief specified was the "Return of the land to the descendants of the...