Search Results

1. Murrogh - Poike 8 (2002) 71 Tauranga MB 2 (71 T 2) [pdf, 531 KB]

   Tauranga Minute Book Volume 71 Folio 2 In the Maori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District DECISION Files: A20020001061 A20020001062 IN THE MATTER of applications by Glenna Murrogh and Heitaru Hickey to partition their interests from Poike 8 Block pursuant to Section 289 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 I refer to the Court's Preliminary Decision which is referred to at Tauranga Minute Book 69/140-143. The Court indicated that it was prepared to make o...

2. Greaterex v Preston [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...(third respondent) who was alleged to have been the builder and the party principally responsible for the negligent construction. Following the settlement, the claimants pursued the claim solely against Mr Tim Preston for the full amount. Mr Preston filed a preliminary response to the claim but chose not to attend the hearing. Summary of Facts 1997 Mr Peter Preston and Ms Easton, first and second respondents bought the section. Mr Peter Preston is Mr Tim Preston’s brother....

3. Example client care letters [pdf, 21 KB]

   ..._____________ CONFIDENTIAL – LEGALLY PRIVILEGED Clients Name Address City (Client postal address) (CITY) Dear [Mr/Miss/Ms] (client surname) Your case has been assigned to me by Legal Aid Services. I am the lawyer responsible for your file. Please contact me as soon as possible to arrange an appointment to discuss your case. The details of your next court appearance are as follows: Venue: (Court name) Date: (Next hearing date) Time: (insert) Legal aid is gove...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 111 Rangitane O Tamaki Nui a rua Incorporated v Manawatu Whanganui Regional Council [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...it had reached a side agreement with Tararua District Council which provided a pathway for resolving Kahungunu's concerns in respect of the two waste water treatment plants which were the subject of the appeals.. On 4 June 2020, Kahungunu filed applications seeking waivers under s 281 allowing it to "rejoin" the appeal proceedings as as 274 party. [2] I issued an interim decision on the waiver applications .1 In it, I expressed the view that it would be an undue preju...

5. [2018] NZSSAA 45 (20 September 2018) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...agreed that the Authority determine this appeal on the basis of their written submissions. [2] The overpayments were the result of changes to the Australian notional rate of superannuation which affected the rate of NZS. When the appellant filed his notice of appeal, the balance of the overpayment after the repayments he had made was $180.58. He has since repaid the overpayment in full and has not disputed the calculation of the overpayment by the Ministry. [3] The Minist...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 192 Invercargill City Council v Smith [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...Plan 10479, Certificate of Title SL6B/459 Southland Registry. B: Under s285 of the Act, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns an application for enforcement orders under s314(1)(a)(ii) of the RMA, filed on 18 July 2019 by the lnvercargill City Council ('ICC') against Callum David Smith. Mr Smith is the owner of 56 Beatrice Street, lnvercargill. The ICC sought orders that Mr Smith immediately desist bringing onto and storing on...

7. [2021] NZREADT 26 - Feng (16 June 2021) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...issued in this matter on 12 April 2021. The ground on which that application is made is that in its decision, the Tribunal stated an assumption that there was no appeal against the penalty that was imposed upon the appellants. [2] The submissions filed included the following reference to authority: The basis for recall was set out in Horowhenua County v Nash (No 2):1 Generally speaking, a judgment once delivered must stand for better or worse subject, of course, to appeal. Were...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 130 Barry v C I Builders Ltd [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...sum totals $29,875.00. [4] The calculation submitted by counsel for Mr Barry is slightly lower than that produced by a strict application of the guidelines.3 The sum sought is $28,799.50. Disbursements of $557.11 are also sought in respect of filing and hearing fees. [5] The defendant company submits that costs based on category 2B are inappropriate in the present case. That is because, it is said, there was a narrow issue involved and that category 2A ought to be applied. R...

9. 21-10-03 AL-3 Waikato Media statement [pdf, 502 KB]

   ...not be permitted to enter unless granted permission by the presiding judge. Masks are to be worn at all times within the courthouse, unless permission is given by a judge. Public counters are closed at Alert Level 3, and all documents can be filed by email to the Registrar. Contact 0800 COURTS (0800 268 787) or the registry for further information. High Court arrangements under Alert Level 3 See the High Court’s operating protocol for Alert Level 3. All High Court matters at...

10. Form 41a Family Invoice PPPR [pdf, 224 KB]

    Version 20 – January 2023 page 1 01/23 form 41a Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Protection of Personal & Property Rights (PPPR) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interi...