Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 115 Auckland Council v KI Braines [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...B, D and E onsite; b) Building C may continue to be used as temporary accommodation only; and c) for clarity, these orders do not apply to Building A (the main house). D: Costs are reserved for seven days. Any application for costs are to be filed within 10 working days; any reply 10 working days after that and any final reply, if any, five working days thereafter. I do not encourage any application for costs. 3 REASONS Introduction [1] This application for change follows...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 90 Industrial Equipment Distributors Lifting Centre Ltd v Scouller [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...concluded that the documents sought are relevant because they relate to an issue arising from the pleadings, I must consider whether the contested documents are commercially sensitive, and whether protective orders should be made. [42] The evidence filed for the defendants emphasised that the documents involved are indeed commercially sensitive; and that to allow a competitor to access another company’s customer files, billing information, invoices and so on, would not be justif...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 98 Farmer Motor Group Ltd v McKenzie [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...2016. 1 In that determination the Authority held that it had jurisdiction to investigate the claim of the defendant, Adam McKenzie, to have been unjustifiably dismissed. The investigation meeting in the Authority was dealt with on the papers filed. The preliminary issue, which the Authority decided in Mr McKenzie’s favour, was whether the plaintiff, Farmer Motor Group Ltd (FMG) had a defence based on the fact that the employment agreement contained a 90-day trial period under...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 107 Watson v Capital & Coast District Health Board [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...made a preliminary decision that there was no option but to terminate Ms Watson’s employment on the basis of incompatibility, and that the necessary trust and confidence in the employment relationship was absent. [5] On 4 June 2015, Ms Watson filed in this Court a de novo challenge in respect of all aspects of the Authority’s determination of 4 May 2015. [6] Correspondence then followed between the parties. This culminated in CCDHB writing to Ms Watson on 16 June 2015 to info...

5. Kepa v Kautai - Estate of James Keepa (2016) 52 Takitimu MB 256 (52 TKT 256) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...stance. Ms Erutoe also confirmed that her brother had no children. Mr Keepa was given notice of the hearing and an opportunity post the hearing to file an objection to the application. No response was received. [7] Judge Marumaru subsequently filed a report to the Chief Judge recommending that the applicant’s evidence be accepted. He considered that the Court had been wrong to exclude Ms Erutoe and her sisters without receiving direct evidence from them. Judge Marumaru consid...

6. Regeling – Orokawa 3B Lots, Lot 4, & 8 (2004) 6 Whangarei Appellate MB 157 (6 APWH 157) [pdf, 636 KB]

   ...APPELLANT: Dovey Regeling represented by Mr W W Peters CORAM: Judge P J Savage (Presiding) Judge G D Carter, Judge L R Harvey DECISION: 30 June 2004 RESERVED DECISION Introduction On or about 11 January 2002 Dovey Regeling ("the Appellant") filed an application pursuant to section 135 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("the Act") seeking a change of status from Maori freehold to General land of Orokawa 3B Lots 4, 7 and 8 ("the Land"). Following a hearing he...

7. Deputy Registrar - Ihaia Taueki Trust (2005) 161 Aotea MB 96 (161 AOT 96) [pdf, 430 KB]

   ...OF Thaia Taueki Trust 12 April 2005 at Whanganui 152 AoteaME 25-50, 12 April 2005 151 Aotea ME 239-244, 17 March 2005 16 November 2005 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY [1] Two applications are presently before the Court. The first was filed by the Deputy Registrar for enforcement of obligations of trust per section 238 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("the Act") and for a judicial conference. The second is an application filed by the Trust's secretary, Mr J...

8. LCRO 164/2019 SM v NL (25 June 2020) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...approximately eight years, any knowledge Mr NL retained of Mr SM would be historic; and (f) it was open to Mr SM to make application to the court for orders preventing Mr NL from acting in the DVA proceedings. 4 Application for review [16] Mr SM filed an application for review on 30 October 2019. [17] He submits that: (a) following termination of his retainer with Mr NL in 2012, Mr NL retained a significant amount of sensitive information about Mr SM and (b) Mr NL’s cl...

9. Taniora v Crown - Pukemakoiti 2 and 4 (2018) 390 Aotea MB 268 (390 AOT 268) [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...were Pei Te Hurinui Jones, Hikaia Amohia, Pakira Tutaki, Weo Wetere and Koro Wetere. The current trustees are Graeme Kilgour, Weo Maag, Raymond Wi, Thomas Tuwhangai, Moera Hughes, Mary Crown and Morgan Rata.3 Procedural history [6] Ms Taniora filed the application for enforcement of obligations of the trust on 20 June 2017, on behalf of the Taniora Maru Whānau Trust. The applicant requested the hearing be held in Hamilton as she resides there, which was opposed by the trustees....

10. Chief Executive Expenses: 1 July 2018 - 31 January 2019 [xlsx, 67 KB]

    Guidance for agencies Chief Executive Expense Disclosures: A Guide for Agency Staff The following is a summary from "Chief Executive Expense Disclosures: A Guide for Agency Staff": http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/ce-expense-disclosures-guide-agency-staff-2017.docx Please read that in full first. In the following worksheets, cells shaded light blue require input. All other cells are locked to prevent change. Purpose The purpose of regular public disclosure of Chief Execut...