Search Results

1. Guide-5-A-Guide-to-Deportation-Appeal-Cancelled-Refugee-and-Protected-Person.pdf [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...section 3.3 for more information about the hearing. 1.11 What information should I send the Tribunal? At the time you send the Tribunal your appeal form, you do not need to send anything else. We will receive a copy of the Refugee Status Branch file, and we will send a copy to you. You must look after this file because you will need to bring it to the hearing. Once the date of the hearing has been set (see section 3.3), the Tribunal will ask you to send any evidence and submissio...

2. Proceeds of Crime Fund

   Round One of 2025 is now closed for applications. This page provides information on the Proceeds of Crime Fund (the Fund). All Information is correct as of 4 April 2025. For any questions, please contact the Fund Administrator at PoCF@justice.govt.nz. On this page: Background to the Fund Purpose of the Fund Criteria for funding Who can apply to the Fund How to apply to the Fund List of initiatives funded by Proceeds of Crime Fund. Background to the Fund The Fund was established in 2009 and has

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. About the justice sector

3. Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Part Reservation Trust v Taueki - The Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block (2015) 343 Aotea MB 254 (343 AOT 254) [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...9 February 2015. However, I reserved leave to Mr Taueki to apply to vacate or adjourn the March fixture providing such application was made on or before Monday 2 March 2015. No application was made. [8] Ms Johnson, on behalf of the trustees, filed an amended application on 10 February 2015 seeking the following relief: (a) A permanent injunction under s 19(1)(a) requiring the removal of the respondent, Mr Philip Taueki, from the Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block including the building...

4. Evesham v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 136 / 2009 (5 November 2009) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...matter was “XX Ltd”. 10 September 2007 Transferred to account 3915/06 in the name of Mr Chesterfield alone. Noted as “o/costs”. [20] I observe that at the very outset the funds appeared to have been erroneously attributed to another file of Mr Chesterfield and Ms London in respect of Mäori Land which preceded the dispute. This was corrected on the same day and need not be considered further. [21] The matter of the $1500 was not referred to by the parties between the e...

5. Wiezoreck v McHugh [2013] NZIACDT 35 (4 June 2013) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...It suffices to note Ms McHugh provided information to establish the only aspect of the complaint that would potentially be upheld was the issue relating to fees. [6] That was the most serious aspect of the complaint. When Ms McHugh disclosed her file it emerged she had told Mr Wiezoreck in a letter dated 24 February 2010 that the “industry standard” hourly rate for a licensed immigration adviser was in the range of €400 to €545 (NZ$740 to NZ$1,000 - approximately). [7] Mr Wiezo...

6. LCRO 48/2019 VW v EX and TY (3 May 2021) [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...within the estimate”. [32] The Committee stated Mr VW, and the other unit owners, had been “provided with regular invoices” and therefore were “fully informed of the additional costs as they arose”. Application for review [33] Mr VW filed an application for review on 15 April 2019. He seeks findings of unsatisfactory conduct against Ms EX and Mr TY for (a) not acting competently, and (b) overcharging him by exceeding their fee estimate. [34] He explains he and his...

7. Adlam v Reihana - Himatangi 1H1A (2022) 447 Aotea MB 1 (447 AOT 1) [pdf, 658 KB]

   ...but because they have differing views about when this application should be considered and granted. 1 Reflecting Hīmatangi as their Rangiātea and the owners being a seed of it. 2 Whenua meaning placenta in this context. 3 See application filed by Mr Adlam on 13 September 2021. 4 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, Preamble, ss 2 and 17. 5 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, s 2. 447 Aotea MB 4 Whakataunga Outcome [5] After considering the application and the evidence and s...

8. MK v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 45 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...1988 and suffered multiple fractures. His claim was accepted at the time and he received entitlements from the Corporation, including weekly compensation. It appears that those entitlements continued until around 1990, when action on the claim file ceased. In accordance with the Corporation’s document retention policy, it appears that the original physical file was destroyed at some point in the 1990s. [8] In 2001, the appellant returned to the Corporation seeking assistance...

9. LCRO 29/2023 CP v SW and KM (19 December 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...the original documentation for the transaction “because your conducts (sic) so far are too suspicious I cannot trust an electronic version.” [54] On 21 February 2022, the applicant instructed another lawyer. The complaint [55] The applicant filed a complaint with the NZLS on 8 March 2022. The complaint appears to include the following elements (in my words); (a) a complaint that the first respondent’s interpretation of the LINZ Guidelines was incorrect, misleading and incompet...

10. [2007] NZEmpC AC 32A/07 Golden v Northland DHB [pdf, 16 KB]

    ...Defendant Hearing: By memorandum received from the defendant on 15 June 2007 Judgment: 19 June 2007 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] Further to my judgment of 1 June 2007 dealing with the challenge and cross- challenge filed in this matter, I have now received a memorandum from counsel for the defendant in relation to costs. [2] As set out in my earlier judgment, Mr Golden has effectively taken no part in the matter. He is not now entitled to be heard on...