Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 53 NZ Amalgamated Engineering Printing & Manufacturing v SCA Hygiene Australasia [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN NZ AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING PRINTING AND MANUFACTURING UNION INC Plaintiff AND SCA HYGIENE AUSTRALASIA LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 12 and 13 July 2010 Judgment: 26 May 2011 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] In my judgment of 10 June 2010 I reserved the issue of costs and invited the parties to attempt to reach agreement on the issues. [2] Coun...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 173 Webb v NZ Tramways & Public Passenger Transport Employees’ Union Incorp [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN BRIAN ALEXANDER WEBB Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND TRAMWAYS AND PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: By submission filed by the defendant on 3 September and by the plaintiff on 13 September 2013 Appearances: Paul Carrucan, advocate for the plaintiff Simon Mitchell, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 September 2013 COSTS JUDGMEN...

3. AH v ZS Ltd [2014] NZDT 625 (11 July 2014) [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...from the edge towards the middle of the screen. The installation was ceased but AH had to pay $80.00 for the installer’s services. [4] AH claims $100 refund for the screen plus $80 for the installer’s fee and $45 for the Disputes Tribunal filing fee. Issues [5] The issues to determine are: (a) Whether or not there was a crack in the windscreen when it was sold to AH. (b) Whether AH is entitled to a remedy under the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993. Law and Decision Was there...

4. Philpott v Zderich [2011] NZWHT Auckland 16 [pdf, 44 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Philpott v Zderich File No: TRI 2009-100-000076/DBH 01947 Citation: [2011] NZWHT Auckland 16 Adjudicator: Peter Andrew Date of Decision: 21 March 2011 Background The claimant brought the claim in regards to her home which she purchased in 1999. A number of the respondents were removed prior to the hearing and the only remaining claims are against: The third respondent, Mr Jones, the project manager. The fourth respondents, Mr Ryan and Mr Ferris, compan...

5. Auckland District Law Society v Garnett [2009] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...Zealand; [b] Counsel for Ms Garnett is to have seven days to file submissions in response to the costs schedules provided. That is to be accompanied by a declaration of Ms Garnett’s financial means and resources; [c] Any response is to be filed within a further seven days and on that basis; [d] The application for costs will be reserved to be delivered in writing. [e] Publication of the orders is to be made as sought in paragraph 4.2 of Mr Collins’ submissions; [f] The rese...

6. Thomas Cameron (dated 21 April 2017) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...bridget.irving@gallawaycookallan.co.nz Email: campbell.hodgson@gallawaycookallan.co.nz TC2-001 1 Introduction 1. My full name is Thomas John Selwyn Cameron. I have previously set out my qualifications and in experience at paragraphs 1 - 2 of my evidence filed with the Court on 27 January 2017. I do not repeat those here. Further Simulation 2. I was commissioned to undertake a further simulation for the Appellant. That simulation relies on photographs provided to me by...

7. Form 27A Fixed Fees J [pdf, 292 KB]

   Templates V15 – July 2018 page 1 07/18 form 27a Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule J Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type High Court Court of Appeal Parole Board Court location Details of cla...

8. Tax Invoice - Criminal legal aid fixed fees - Schedule J [pdf, 438 KB]

   Templates V8 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 27b Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule J Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type High Court Court of Appeal Parole Board Court location Details of clai...

9. 2021-04-27 - ORC - MOC - Priorities - conf.pdf [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...(philip.maw@wynnwilliams.co.nz / michelle.mehlhopt@wynnwilliams.co.nz) 1 MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: 1 The purpose of this Memorandum is to respond to the Court’s directions in its Minute dated 23 April that the Otago Regional Council file a memorandum identifying parties to the proceedings calling planning evidence on the topic of priorities. 2 The following table identifies the parties who have called planning evidence on the topic of priorities and the name of the rel...

10. [2020] NZEnvC 183 Te Mana o Te Wai Hapu Integration Roopu Charitable Trust v Northland Regional Council.pdf [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...2020 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON APPLICATION FOR STRIKEOUT A: The prospective appellants Te Pokapu Tiaki Taiao O Te Tai Tokerau Trust and R Oxborough are struck out. They may apply to become involved in the proceedings again if they file application within the next ten (10) working days. Te Mana O Te Wai Hapu Integration Roopu Charitable Trust & Ors -v- Northland Regional Council [2020] EnvC 2 B: The appeal otherwise remains on foot. C: Costs are reserved. REAS...