Search Results

1. Form 44 Application for contempt of enforcement proceedings [pdf, 496 KB]

   ...information to assist the enforcement process. You only need to complete the steps in Section C that are relevant to your application. • You can only use this form to apply for one hearing for one debtor. If you have more than one debtor, you must file a separate application for each debtor. Who can sign this form? You can only sign this form if you are the judgment creditor or their lawyer. Anyone can help you complete the rest of the form. How much does it cost to make an applicatio...

2. Application for attachment order [pdf, 820 KB]

   ...assist the enforcement process. You only need to complete the steps in Section C that are relevant to your application. • You can only use this form to apply for one attachment order against one debtor. If you have more than one debtor, you must file a separate application for each debtor. Who can sign this form? You can only sign this form if you are the applicant or the applicant’s lawyer. The applicant can be either the judgment creditor or the judgment debtor. Anyone can help you...

3. Application for contempt enforcement proceedings [pdf, 496 KB]

   ...information to assist the enforcement process. You only need to complete the steps in Section C that are relevant to your application. • You can only use this form to apply for one hearing for one debtor. If you have more than one debtor, you must file a separate application for each debtor. Who can sign this form? You can only sign this form if you are the judgment creditor or their lawyer. Anyone can help you complete the rest of the form. How much does it cost to make an applicatio...

4. Lawson v Health and Disability Commissioner (Strike-out) [2023] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...file. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Lawson v Health and Disability Commissioner (Strike-out) [2023] NZHRRT 15.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 15 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] On 24 September 2019 Miss Lawson filed this claim with the Tribunal. She claims that, in dealing with the complaint referred to at [1] above, the HDC did not attach her statement of correction in the manner required by Rule 7 of the Health Information Privacy Code 1994 (“...

5. [2025] NZEmpC 129 VKU v PHZ (Judgment of Judge M S King, 27 June 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person No appearance for defendant Judgment: 27 June 2025 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M S KING (Dismissal for want of prosecution) [1] On 21 November 2023 the plaintiff filed a non-de novo challenge to a substantive determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 [2] The plaintiff advised the Court’s registry that he had served the proceedings on the defendant on 16 February 2024. The registry...

6. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 2688 [2013] NZCOP 13 [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...Recording Industry Association of New Zealand) to the Copyright Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) under s 122I of the Copyright Act 1994, (“the Act”). This section is part of a comprehensive procedure directed at copyright infringement by peer-to-peer file sharing on the Internet. RIANZ is acting as agent for the rights owner: “rights owner” is defined as including an agent for one or more copyright owners.1 [2] The procedure was intended to be, by comparison with traditional copyr...

7. Trustees of the Maungatautari 4G Section IV Trust v Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust - Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 634 (2015 APPEAL 634) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...A discussion ensued on whether in fact a rehearing of the decision was being sought. Counsel submitted that if the additional evidence could not be heard by this Court the appeal would be withdrawn and an application for a rehearing might be filed in the Māori Land Court. [3] The appeal was then withdrawn and the parties were invited to file submissions on costs which have now been received. Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust (“MEIT”) seeks an 80 per cent contribution of...

8. Body Corporate 85978 and Unit Owners of St Pauls Apartments v Wellington City Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 9 [pdf, 228 KB]

   ................................................... 9 WHAT IS THE DATE THAT STOPS THE CLOCK RUNNING FOR LIMITATION PURPOSES FOR UNITS SUBSEQUENTLY ADDED TO THE CLAIM? .................11 DO OWNERS OF UNITS THAT HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE ELIGIBLE HAVE TO ESTABLISH THEY HAVE FILED THE APPROPRIATE PAPERWORK TO BE PART OF THE CLAIM?.....................................................................................................16 ARE THE QUEST UNITS DWELLINGHOUSES AS DEFINED BY THE ACT? .....

9. National Standards Committee v Shand [2019] NZLCDT 2 [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...low prospects of success only at a late stage in the proceedings. [6] Charge Two relates to Mr Shand’s conduct after terminating his retainer with Mr Bligh. The allegations against him are: (a) that he failed to provide Mr Bligh’s client file to Mr Bligh’s new lawyers without undue delay; and (b) that he breached his duty of confidentiality by making comments to the media about Mr Bligh in relation to the High Court proceedings. Preliminary matter [7] The applicant reli...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 106 Temara v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 48 KB]

    ...1 Temara v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2014] NZERA Auckland 144. [3] Mr Temara now applies to the Court for leave to bring the challenge out of time. The application is based on the fact that the late filing arose through counsel error and inadvertence. The application states that the case is of significant importance to the applicant and touches on his professional registration as a social worker. The application further states that no r...