Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 59 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...circumstances [67] There is only a handful of cases dealing with s 12A and both parties referred to the decisions of the Court in those cases. However, the arrangements at issue in this case are unlike any the Court has previously considered. [68] In Labour Inspector v Tech 5 Recruitment Ltd8 a full Court of the Employment Court was convened to consider s 12A of the Wages Protection Act, recognising the lack of developed case law. The context was recruitment of overseas employe...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 117 QDY v Counties Manukau District Health Board [pdf, 230 KB]

   QDY v COUNTIES MANUKAU DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2022] NZEmpC 117 [4 July 2022] ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF APPLICANT’S NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 117 EMPC 117/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove a matter to the Employment Court BETWEEN QDY Applicant AND COUNTIES MANUKAU DISTRICT...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 73 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...circumstances [67] There is only a handful of cases dealing with s 12A and both parties referred to the decisions of the Court in those cases. However, the arrangements at issue in this case are unlike any the Court has previously considered. [68] In Labour Inspector v Tech 5 Recruitment Ltd8 a full Court of the Employment Court was convened to consider s 12A of the Wages Protection Act, recognising the lack of developed case law. The context was recruitment of overseas employe...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 36 Zhou v CE of DOL [pdf, 232 KB]

   PHILIP ZHOU V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 36 [15 April 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 36 ARC 115/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN PHILIP ZHOU Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR Defendant Hearing: 14 March 2011 (in Chambers) (Heard at Auckland

5. [2023] NZEmpC 56 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 471 KB]

   TE WHATU ORA – HEALTH NEW ZEALAND v PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION, TE PŪKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI [2023] NZEmpC 56 [5 April 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 56 EMPC 62/2022 IN THE MATTER OF applications for declarations under the Equal Pay Act 1972 and the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN TE WHATU ORA – HEALTH NEW ZEALAND Plaintiff AND

6. [2009] NZEmpC WC 17A/09 Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [pdf, 138 KB]

   IDEA SERVICES LTD V DICKSON WN WC 17A/09 11 December 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 17A/09 WRC 31/08 WRC 34/08 WRC 31/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Plaintiff AND PHILLIP WILLIAM DICKSON Defendant WRC 34/08 IN THE MATTER OF a matter removed to the Court by the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PHILLIP WILLIAM DICKSON Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LI

7. [2023] NZEmpC 237 Total Property Services (Canterbury) Ltd v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...must be kept for up to six years but pointed out that there is no limit on the actual length of time for which the record can be maintained. In any event, those records are able to be accessed by the employee, that person’s representative or a Labour Inspector. An employer in Crest’s position is not referred to in either section as having a right to access the entire record and there is nothing in s 69OB, it was said, that specifies the span of time over which the information mu...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...communications or actions or documentation from which the intention of the parties can be derived, then the real nature of the relationship may be determined as something different to that disclosed in the contractual documents.8 4 Mehta v Elliott (Labour Inspector) [2003] 1 ERNZ 451 (EmpC) at [22]. 5 McDonald v Ontrack Infrastructure Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 132, [2010] ERNZ 223. 6 Mehta v Elliott (Labour Inspector), above n 4, at [22]. 7 Hutton v Provencocadmus Ltd (in rec) [2012] NZ...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 48 E Tu Inc v Mount Cook Airline Ltd [pdf, 314 KB]

   E TŪ INCORPORATED v MOUNT COOK AIRLINE LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 48 [18 March 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 48 EMPC 295/2019 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN E TŪ INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND MOUNT COOK AIRLINE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 May 2021 and further submissions filed on 29...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 112 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 431 KB]

    RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 [31 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 265/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC First Defendant AND E TU INC (FORMERLY THE SERVICE & FOOD WOR