893 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 598 APPLICANT NQ RESPONDENT T Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NQ is to pay $1328.83 to T Ltd on or before 6 September 2024; and The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NQ and T Ltd’s driver, Mr C, were involved in a minor motor vehicle collision while driving on the southern moto...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 37 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT ST APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) BC Limited The Tribunal orders: ST is to pay BC Limited $4,539.70 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. The applicant, EC, was travelling north along [road 1] when the front of ST’s vehicle hit the right side of EC’s vehicle....
...applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. There was a collision involving three cars in [Street] in [City] on 11 March 2023. TX and his insurer, X Ltd, say that the collision was caused when a [vehicle] with the registration number [redacted] (the black car) overtook TX’s car. The black car did not stop after the collision. TX and his insurer say that the black car was owned by B Ltd at the time of the collision and seek an order that...
...NZDT 153 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT HDC Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT HD The Tribunal orders: HDC Ltd and HD are to pay KQ $2,600.00 on or before 21 October 2022. Reasons 1. On 16 April 2022, at about 7.20pm, vehicles driven by KQ and HD collided at the intersection of [Street 1], [Street 2] and [Street 3] in [City A]. The vehicle driven by HD was owned by HDC Ltd. KQ suffered damage to his vehicle. Neither party was insured. KQ believed thar HD h...
...this is typical of how these activities are undertaken at other marina sites. In my assessment, loading and servicing is appropriately provided for within the proposal. Consequently, I consider the potential loading and servicing effects to be negligible. Access to and From the Marina Parking 20. Access to and from the marina parking area is to occur through a permitted vehicle area predominantly used by public transport servicing the Matiatia wharf activities. Marina p...
...ended Dec-12 Year ended Dec-16 Year ended Dec-17 Change in last year Change in last 5 years Homicide and related2 72 139 151 Acts intended to cause injury 15,644 15,352 14,864 -3% -5% Sexual assault 1,195 1,332 1,347 1% 13% Dangerous or negligent acts 8,049 7,239 7,327 1% -9% Abduction and harassment 2,255 3,010 2,843 -6% 26% Robbery 916 1,064 1,262 19% 38% Burglary 5,193 4,463 4,166 -7% -20% Theft 11,690 11,689 11,765 1% 1% Fraud and deception 2,952 3,139 3,032 -3% 3% Illic...
...rather than excellent. 10. For these reasons, DU and HU are not entitled to a remedy from UT in relation to the damaged wall. Are DU and HU entitled to compensation for the cost of repairing the letterbox? 11. The relevant law is the law of negligence in tort (a tort being a civil wrong). Negligence concerns the duties that one person owes to another to take care. A property owner claiming that a driver negligently caused damage to his or her property has the onus of proving on...
...her brother. The animal belonged to friends of ZO’s and was one of five of their animals that had been in the paddock about 6 weeks. Law [3] The relevant law is s 5 of the Animals Law Reform Act 1989 which confirms that general principles of negligence apply. Under those general principles, a person in control of stock is required to take reasonable steps to prevent the stock from escaping and causing risk to passing motorists. Issues [4] The issues to determine are: • W...
...collided. 6. OL says she checked behind her because this was a school zone and as a parent at the school was very aware that there could be young children around. ST says she believes OL did not check behind but reversed rapidly. 7. The law of negligence imposes a duty on all road users to operate their vehicle so that they do not cause damage to others. The Land Transport (Road User) Rule provides for the standard of care CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 required of a reasona...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 686 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT GO APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) K Insurance Ltd The Tribunal orders: GO is to pay $9343.84 (including a $1000.00 excess) to K Insurance Ltd on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons 1. At the first hearing, GO acknowledged liability for the vehicle collision in which SX had bra...