BG Ltd v YT [2014] NZDT 603 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 218 KB]
...not be repaired and therefore could not be re-leased. [15] However, BG is entitled to the amount of its loss under section 68 CCCFA only if it can establish that the car was indeed no longer capable of being re-leased due to the respondent’s negligence after she had paid $1,170 in rental payments during the period from 22 February to the date it was repossessed and has complied with the requirements of the C(R)A in relation to repossession. YT accepts that the current market value...