Search Results

Search results for Negligence vehicle.

858 items matching your search terms

  1. NG v CG [2024] NZDT 343 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...corner’ as he entered [Road 1]? b. Did NG contribute to the crash with negligent action? c. Is the amount claimed fair and reasonable? Did the crash and damage occur because CG ‘cut the corner’ as he entered [Road 1]? 5. Under the law of negligence all drivers owe other road users a duty of care and in this case, other property owners. The duty of care requires drivers to drive to the standard of a CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 reasonable and prudent driver. This sta...

  2. AFL v ZUK [2012] NZDT 283 (14 January 2012) [pdf, 79 KB]

    ...by the tort of negligence and r 7.2(1) of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004. [3] Rule 7.2(1) of the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004 states: A person must not cause a hazard to any person by opening or closing a door of a motor vehicle, or by leaving the door of a motor vehicle open. [4] All drivers owe a duty of care to other road users to exercise due caution and care. This duty of care includes insuring that the way is clear before opening a vehicle door....

  3. OIA-120631.pdf [pdf, 794 KB]

    ...Specifically, you requested: 1. Number of convicted charges for traffic offences, by offence type, for 2023 and 2024 (year ending December): • Driving causing death • Driving under the influence of alcohol or other substance • Dangerous or negligent operation (driving) of a vehicle • Driving while licence disqualified or suspended • Driving without a licence • Driver licence offences, not elsewhere classified • Registration offences • Roadworthiness offences • E...

  4. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2020 [xlsx, 278 KB]

    ...definitions and data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: There were some differences in the type of offence that was the most serious for each remand type. For 'at large' in 2019, half of people (51%) had a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory' offence (e.g. excess breath alcohol) as their most serious offence and 21% had an offence for 'dangerous or negligent act endangering persons' (eg careless driving). For 'bail', 21% of people in 2019 h...

  5. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large June 2020 [xlsx, 279 KB]

    ...definitions and data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: There were some differences in the type of offence that was the most serious for each remand type. For 'at large' in 2018/2019, half of people (50%) had a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory' offence (eg excess breath alcohol) as their most serious offence and 22% had an offence for 'dangerous or negligent act endangering persons' (eg careless driving). For 'bail', 25% of people in 201...

  6. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2019 [xlsx, 280 KB]

    ...definitions and data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: There were some differences in the type of offence that was the most serious for each remand type. For 'at large' in 2018, half of people (50%) had a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory' offence (eg excess breath alcohol) as their most serious offence and 22% had an offence for 'dangerous or negligent act endangering persons' (eg careless driving). For 'bail', 25% of people in 2018 had...

  7. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2021 [xlsx, 280 KB]

    ...page Example interpretation: There were some differences in the type of offence that was the most frequently a person's most serious for each remand type. For 'at large' in 2020, just over half of people (56%) had a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory' offence (eg excess breath alcohol) as their most serious offence and 18% had an offence for 'dangerous or negligent act endangering persons' (eg careless driving). For 'bail', 22% of people in 2020 had as...

  8. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large June 2021 [xlsx, 280 KB]

    ...and data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: There were some differences in the type of offence that was the most serious for each remand type. For 'at large' in 2019/2020, over half of people (53%) had a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory' offence (eg excess breath alcohol) as their most serious offence and 19% had an offence for 'dangerous or negligent act endangering persons' (eg careless driving). For 'bail', 22% of people in 2019/2020...

  9. BT & FT v Council [2015] NZDT 1492 (30 September 2015) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 a) When did the prior crash happen? When was the Council/Transport informed of the fuel spill? Did any delay by the Council/Transport in responding to the fuel spill cause FT’s crash? b) If the Council/Transport was negligent, what sum is payable in damages? c) Did XQ Ltd cause further damage by negligent towing? d) If so, what sum is payable in damages by XQ Ltd? When did the prior crash happen? When was the Council/Transport informed of the fu...

  10. OIA-121103.pdf [pdf, 815 KB]

    ...0312: Non-aggravated sexual assault 37 1% 032: Non-assaultive sexual offences 0321: Non-assaultive sexual offences against a child 3 <1% 0322: Child pornography offences 32 <1% 0329: Non-assaultive sexual offences 3 <1% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 041: Dangerous or negligent operation of a vehicle 0411: Driving under the influence of alcohol or other substance 13 <1% 0412: Dangerous or negligent operation (driving) of a vehicle 39 1% 049: Ot...