Search Results

1. Lowe and Ors as Trustees of the Vivienne Hicks Family Trust v Morrison [2011] NZWHT Auckland 27 [pdf, 263 KB]

   ............................... 9 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 9 The claim against the First Respondent .................................................... 10 WAS THE COUNCIL NEGLIGENT IN ISSUING THE BUILDING CONSENT, THE CODE OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE AND CARRYING OUT INSPECTIONS? ........................................................................................... 13 The Consent .......................

2. Director of Proceedings v Emms [2013] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 165 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 5 Reference No. HRRT 017/2011 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND ROBERT EMMS DEFENDANT AT NELSON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haine

3. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report April 2023 [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report April 2023 BBBB Published in April 2023 by the Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DXSX10088, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN: 2623-999X Suggested citation Ministry of Justice. 2023. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report. April 2023. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. This document is available at https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/justice- statistics/youth-justice-indicators/ Disclaimer �

4. 04-Appendix-Four-DCR_Part1.pdf [pdf, 23 MB]

   ŌTAKI TO NORTH OF LEVIN HIGHWAY PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REPORT PREPARED FOR WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY JULY 2022 Stantec │ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REPORT │ JULY 2022 Status: FINAL│Project No.: 310203848│ Our ref: 221010 DCR_V0.9.docx The conclusions in the Report are Stantec’s professional opinion, as of the time of the Report, and concerning the scope described in the Report. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and informat

5. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...there should be new valley trays. Messrs Light and Paykel considered that repairing existing valley trays would be sufficient. Mr Paykel said there was no damage directly attributable to problems with the roof. The Tribunal considers there was negligence in the roofing installation by the eighth respondent exposing the claimants to loss by way of likely future damage. XV. CLAIM AGAINST SECOND RESPONDENT, MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL Building Permit Failures [73] The claim...

6. Koria & Anor v Johnson & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 14 [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Koria and Ms Lava allege that Mr Hardy and Mr Woodger each breached the duty of care they owed them by failing to identify the defects in the building as it was being built and when it was completed. Mr Hardy and Mr Woodger deny that they were negligent. Mr Hardy asserts that as a new and junior employee he did not owe a duty of care to the claimants. Mr Woodger acknowledges that as the certifier, he owed a duty of care but he asserts that he carried out his responsibilities proper...

7. 26.-Evidence-of-Ms-Jo-Healy-Social-Impacts.PDF [PDF, 352 KB]

   ...and Mr Grant Eccles. This will in turn reduce potential impacts on the way people live, community character, health and wellbeing and the quality of the living environment. 41. With mitigation, local scale impacts are assessed as potentially negligible to very-low negative social impacts. Sub-local scale social impacts are assessed as negligible to moderate. Page 10 Operational Impacts (without mitigation)4 Spatial Distribution Impacts Regional Local Sub-local T...

8. LCRO 127/2024 ZU v TC, NE, GQ and Law firm A (13 June 2025) [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...was “incorrect and unjust”; and (b) Ms TC’s error represented a “serious breach of trust and confidentiality” which had a direct impact on her financial position; and (c) the error was not an honest mistake, it reflected a pattern of negligence and reckless disregard for her rights as a client; and (d) the firm’s aggressive pursuit of fees was unacceptable in the face of their professional misconduct. [48] Ms ZU’s review application was supported by a comprehensive r...

9. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Ben Farrell [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   BI-309448-3-478-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF BEN FARRELL ____________________________________________________________ GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN Solicitor on record: B Irving

10. [2011] NZEmpC 169 Kim v Thermosash Commercial Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...action occurred. [4] The plaintiff filed a challenge in this Court against the whole of the Authority’s determination on a de novo basis. He pleads that Thermosash is obliged to pay him a week’s wages and claims $50,000 compensation for negligence and unethical behaviour which caused emotional harm and permanent physical injuries, and that his employer failed to respond appropriately to a request for extra assistance in October 2007. [5] The defendant has filed an applicat...