Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 206 Faapito v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 237 KB]

   LAINE FALANAIPUPU FAAPITO V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 206 [5 December 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 206 ARC 82/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LAINE FALANAIPUPU FAAPITO Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Defendant Hearing: 4-7 April 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Kirsty McDo

2. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report December 2020 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report December 2020 BBBB Disclaimer Published by the Ministry of Justice The infographics provided in this report only include data until 30 June 2020, and do not reflect any changes which have occurred since then. Furthermore, Police data in this report are counted differently from official Police statistics. As a result, the figures produced may not be directly comparable with other similar statistics published elsewhere. Gaps in the numbering

3. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report August 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report August 2019 BBBB Disclaimer Published by the Ministry of Justice The infographics provided in this report only include data until 31 December 2018, and do not reflect any changes which have occurred since then. Furthermore, Police data in this report are counted differently from official Police statistics. As a result, the figures produced may not be directly comparable with other similar statistics published elsewhere. Gaps in the numberi

4. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report December 2021 [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report December 2021 BBBB Disclaimer Published by the Ministry of Justice The infographics provided in this report only include data until 30 June 2021, and do not reflect any changes which have occurred since then. Furthermore, Police data in this report are counted differently from official Police statistics. As a result, the figures produced may not be directly comparable with other similar statistics published elsewhere. Gaps in the numberin

5. [2024] NZREADT 23 – CAC 2106 v Hu (29 July 2024) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...1804. 18 standards to which s 73(b) is directed are those relating to competence and care in conducting real estate agency work. [30] This is not to say that s 73(a) could not apply to work carried out by a licensee so incompetently or negligently as to amount to disgraceful conduct according to the s 73(a) tests. If the work was not real estate agency work, but the person doing the work was a licensee, the appropriate provision for a charge would be s 73(a). This is a point...

6. Standard explanation of effects and implications of anEPA in relation to property [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...order to allow: • the witnesses to belong to the same legal firm or the same trustee corporation • the same person to witness both donors’ signatures if the witness is satisfied and certifies that doing so does not constitute more than a negligible risk of conflict of interest. Consult To ask for advice and give that advice proper consideration before making a decision. This includes making sure the person being asked for advice has all the information they need to bas...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 147 Grants Motels Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 599 KB]

   ...correct technique is being used In application; 3. Ensuring all trees are being affected by the herbicide, ' . ! \, ·11.8 A flnal sample of the entire property needs to occur in 2020. At this point in time It is hoped that pine numbers are negligible, and that the person monitoring during that final visit can kill any remaining trees. 12.0 Other recommendations 12. 1 It Is unclear whether the Corsican pines have been removed yet. If they have not, then these pine should...

8. LCRO 119/2022 FT v GS (31 October 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...and the Standards Committee decision [9] Mr FT lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS) on 10 December 2021. The substance of his complaint was that Mr GS: (a) had been incompetent, dishonest, and negligent in his representation of him; and (b) had incorrectly completed an application to amend his grant of legal aid and in doing so had acted contrary to his instructions; and (c) had misrepresented his case to the Legal Services Agenc...

9. LCRO 122/2020 G & P LN v Todd Whitcombe and RC findings & publication decisions (4 May 2021 & 22 June 2021) [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...He refers to the fact that on a number of occasions he recommended that they take independent legal advice. [45] Included here are extracts from Mr RC’s summary.25 • When I commenced acting, I did not believe that there was more than a negligible risk that I might be unable to discharge my obligations to Mr and Mrs LN. Before entering into the agreement, they had made all enquiries they deemed necessary in relation to due diligence. The LNs had initially intended to make t...

10. AU v ACC (Personal Injury) [2024] NZACC 098 [pdf, 466 KB]

    ...Quentin Reeves, Radiologist, recorded that there was prominent narrowing of the C6/7 disc space with endplate sclerosis and irregularity and moderate prominent uptake on SPECT scanning. There was also narrowing of the neurocentral joints with negligible uptake of the joints. [48] On 28 October 2020, Dr Armstrong met with the appellant and completed a whole person impairment (WPI) assessment. In his subsequent report, Dr Armstrong 11 noted that he had examined and assessed the...