Search Results

1. 13.-Evidence-of-Mr-Phil-Peet-Transport.PDF [PDF, 1.3 MB]

   ...including freight and logistics companies, to better plan beyond their travel and become more efficient. This is especially important as the route between Wellington and Palmerston North is a critical freight link. 35. Side road delays will reduce to negligible levels, except for a couple of intersections in urban Levin. 36. Community connectivity will be improved through reduced journey times. While the location of the Ō2NL Project will result in some increased journey distanc...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v PL [2016] NZLCDT 6 [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...made by O. Decision [80] For the reasons discussed we find that the respondent failed to discharge his obligation in respect of discovery. [81] We have found that his failure did not amount to misconduct or recklessness. His conduct was not negligent or incompetent to the degree required to reflect on his fitness to practise or bring his profession into disrepute. [82] He was negligent however. This stemmed from his initial failure in July 2008 to enquire further into the ex...

3. NZCASS Technical manual [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.

4. E31 Second Planning JWS [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...power and telephone installations and infrastructure, road infrastructure assets such as footpaths, kerbs, catch-pits, pavements and street furniture; w)x) “Damage” means - including Aesthetic, Serviceability, Stability, but does not include Negligible Damage as described in the table below: Building Damage Classification Category of Damage Normal Degree of Severity Description of Typical Damage (Building Damage Classification after Burland (1995), and Mair et al (...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 176 Drivesure Ltd v McQuillan [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...will now cease (including at the PCC site) from close of business today as a result of the government lock down. [21] Mr Ranson did this as he thought that, in the circumstances, it would be “unwise, imprudent and perhaps even bordering on negligent”, for Drivesure to offer to pay out more than the contractual period of notice. Mr Ranson confirmed that the defendants would not be required (and not able) to work out their notice period but would be paid in full for t...

6. Panuku Developments Limited Amended Proposed Conditions 18 July 2018 [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...power and telephone installations and infrastructure, road infrastructure assets such as footpaths, kerbs, catch-pits, pavements and street furniture; y) “Damage” means - including Aesthetic, Serviceability, Stability, but does not include Negligible Damage as described in the table below: Building Damage Classification Category of Damage Normal Degree of Severity Description of Typical Damage (Building Damage Classification after Burland (1995), and Mair et al (19...

7. LCRO 50/2020 M and N PQ v WR (23 April 2021) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...(f) Mr WR had failed to take sufficient steps to source evidence of Mr SF’s continuing involvement that was highly relevant to their case; and (g) this failure, together with Mr WR’s failure to record the mediation conference, constituted negligence on his part; and (h) Mr WR had delayed progressing their case in order to allow Mr SF opportunity to mitigate problems that Mr SF had caused; and (i) Mr WR’s failure to consider the second limb of their claim at mediation, “co...

8. Kendal v Sherbourne LCRO 69 / 2009 (19 August 2009) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...unbecoming. Misconduct was generally considered to be conduct: of sufficient gravity to be termed ‘reprehensible’ (or ‘inexcusable’, ‘disgraceful’ or ‘deplorable’ or ‘dishonourable’) or if the default can be said to arise from negligence such negligence must be either reprehensible or be of such a degree or so frequent as to reflect on his fitness to practise. (Atkinson v Auckland District Law Society NZLPDT, 15 August 1990; Complaints Committee No 1 of the Auck...

9. Philpott v Zderich [2011] NZWHT Auckland 16 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Messrs Ryan and Ferris, both company directors, personally installed the Insulclad cladding system and that both are personally responsible for the primary and the secondary defects. [6] Ms Philpott sues all three remaining respondents in negligence, contending that each are jointly and severally liable for the full costs of a reclad and associated losses. The total amount of damages claimed is $376,590. [7] One of the key challenges the Tribunal faces in determining...

10. [2021] NZREADT 36 - Lindsay-Penalty (13 July 2021) [pdf, 279 KB]

    ...TRIBUNAL (Charge and Penalty) ____________________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] Mr Lindsay has admitted two charges of misconduct: [a] First charge: under s 73(b) (seriously incompetent or seriously negligent real estate agency work) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (“the Act”), in relation to his failure to properly supervise a salesperson; and [b] Second charge: under s 73(c) (wilful or reckless contravention of a provision of...