892 items matching your search terms
1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 5 Reference No. HRRT 017/2011 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND ROBERT EMMS DEFENDANT AT NELSON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haine
Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report April 2023 BBBB Published in April 2023 by the Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DXSX10088, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN: 2623-999X Suggested citation Ministry of Justice. 2023. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report. April 2023. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. This document is available at https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/justice- statistics/youth-justice-indicators/ Disclaimer
ŌTAKI TO NORTH OF LEVIN HIGHWAY PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REPORT PREPARED FOR WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY JULY 2022 Stantec │ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REPORT │ JULY 2022 Status: FINAL│Project No.: 310203848│ Our ref: 221010 DCR_V0.9.docx The conclusions in the Report are Stantec’s professional opinion, as of the time of the Report, and concerning the scope described in the Report. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and informat
...there should be new valley trays. Messrs Light and Paykel considered that repairing existing valley trays would be sufficient. Mr Paykel said there was no damage directly attributable to problems with the roof. The Tribunal considers there was negligence in the roofing installation by the eighth respondent exposing the claimants to loss by way of likely future damage. XV. CLAIM AGAINST SECOND RESPONDENT, MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL Building Permit Failures [73] The claim...
BI-309448-3-478-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF BEN FARRELL ____________________________________________________________ GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN Solicitor on record: B Irving
...Koria and Ms Lava allege that Mr Hardy and Mr Woodger each breached the duty of care they owed them by failing to identify the defects in the building as it was being built and when it was completed. Mr Hardy and Mr Woodger deny that they were negligent. Mr Hardy asserts that as a new and junior employee he did not owe a duty of care to the claimants. Mr Woodger acknowledges that as the certifier, he owed a duty of care but he asserts that he carried out his responsibilities proper...
...and Mr Grant Eccles. This will in turn reduce potential impacts on the way people live, community character, health and wellbeing and the quality of the living environment. 41. With mitigation, local scale impacts are assessed as potentially negligible to very-low negative social impacts. Sub-local scale social impacts are assessed as negligible to moderate. Page 10 Operational Impacts (without mitigation)4 Spatial Distribution Impacts Regional Local Sub-local T...
...was “incorrect and unjust”; and (b) Ms TC’s error represented a “serious breach of trust and confidentiality” which had a direct impact on her financial position; and (c) the error was not an honest mistake, it reflected a pattern of negligence and reckless disregard for her rights as a client; and (d) the firm’s aggressive pursuit of fees was unacceptable in the face of their professional misconduct. [48] Ms ZU’s review application was supported by a comprehensive r...
...action occurred. [4] The plaintiff filed a challenge in this Court against the whole of the Authority’s determination on a de novo basis. He pleads that Thermosash is obliged to pay him a week’s wages and claims $50,000 compensation for negligence and unethical behaviour which caused emotional harm and permanent physical injuries, and that his employer failed to respond appropriately to a request for extra assistance in October 2007. [5] The defendant has filed an applicat...
...upheld. [39] Section 51 of the Act confers these powers using general language. The application of the power is relatively uncomplicated where the grounds on which the complaint has been upheld would establish a civil claim for breach of contract, negligence, or another tort; given the standard of proof before this Tribunal is no less than would be the case for bringing the claim in a civil proceeding. Accordingly, in such circumstances, the Tribunal will ordinarily apply the same princ...