Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Anderson [2022] NZLCDT 25 (22 July 2022) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...relation to this personal transaction where she was representing herself, and considered Mr R to be represented by the other lawyers available to him. Issue 2 – Charge 2 [47] This charge is laid under s 7(1)(a)(ii) of the LCA. Alternatives of negligence (s 241(c)) or unsatisfactory conduct (s 12(c)) are also pleaded. Ms V, the person who defrauded Ms Anderson in the circumstances under consideration, had, at times been a former client of Ms Anderson. The Standards Committee...

2. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horsley [2014] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...Hodge to the well-known decision of Pillai v Messiter.19 In a well quoted passage Kirby P said when discussing what was required to achieve a standard of misconduct: “It includes a deliberate departure from accepted standards, or such serious negligence as, although not deliberate, to portray indifference and an abuse of the privileges which accompany registration as a medical practitioner.” [46] This has of course been adopted in relation to legal practitioners in a number of...

3. People charged and convicted of offences December 2020 [xlsx, 273 KB]

   ...and data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: In 2020, 66,114 people were charged with an offence. A person may be charged with more than one offence in a year. For 20,438 people (31%) their most serious offence was a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory offence'. Compared to the previous year, the number of people charged decreased by 9% in 2020 (from 72,264 people in 2019). This cell has been frozen to allow scrolling across all years of the data Offence type (ANZSOC d...

4. People charged and convicted of offences June 2020 [xlsx, 761 KB]

   ...data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: In 2019/2020, 66,619 people were charged with an offence. A person may be charged with more than one offence in a year. For 20,816 people (31%) their most serious offence was a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory offence'. Compared to the previous year, the number of people charged decreased by 10% in 2019/2020 (from 73,914 people in 2018/2019). This cell has been frozen to allow scrolling across all years of the data Offence ty...

5. People charged and convicted offences June 2021 [xlsx, 271 KB]

   ...data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: In 2020/2021, 68,470 people were charged with an offence. A person may be charged with more than one offence in a year. For 22,822 people (33%) their most serious offence was a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory offence'. Compared to the previous year, the number of people charged increased by 3% in 2020/2021 (from 66,629 people in 2019/2020). This cell has been frozen to allow scrolling across all years of the data Offence typ...

6. People charged and convicted of offences December 2021 [xlsx, 273 KB]

   ...and data notes Back to contents page Example interpretation: In 2021, 58,634 people were charged with an offence. A person may be charged with more than one offence in a year. For 19,937 people (34%) their most serious offence was a 'traffic and vehicle regulatory offence'. Compared to the previous year, the number of people charged with an offence decreased by 11% in 2021 (from 66,112 people in 2020). This cell has been frozen to allow scrolling across all years of the data Offen...

7. [2015] NZEnvC 218 Waiheke Marinas Ltd [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORETHEE~ONMENTCOURT Hearing at: Court: Appearances: Decision No. [2015] NZEnvC 218 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of a Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf BY W AIHEKE MARINAS LIMITED ("WML") (ENV -2014-AKL-OOO 174) Applicant at Auckland in the weeks of 6, 13,20 and 27 October 2014 and

8. Supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: Extending the duration limit of Police safety orders [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...Police safety orders | 18 5.3 What other impacts is this approach likely to have? The benefit for victims is difficult to quantify as it will greatly vary. In some circumstances, it could save a victim’s life. In other cases, it may provide negligible benefit. The benefit of saving a life needs no elaboration and should not be overlooked as a benefit in the analysis. The proposal will also reduce trauma to children involved. This improves their long-term life outcomes, which i...

9. Compensation-for-a-Wrongly-Convicted-and-Imprisoned-Individual-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...After adding the amounts from the previous calculations, the total amount of compensation may be adjusted by up to $150,000 to reflect specific aggravating or mitigating features:8 36.1. It may be increased by up to $150,000 to reflect misconduct or negligence in conducting the investigation that led to the applicant's prosecution or conviction or to reflect bad faith by the prosecution in bringing or continuing the prosecution. 9 36.2. It may be decreased by up to $150,000 to reflect...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 110 Cowan v Kidd [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...work on Kidd Partnership’s farms were done for the benefit of Kidd Partnership and with the expectation of reward. [34] The truck driving was that which would be expected of an employee. Mr Cowan did as directed and used Kidd Partnership’s vehicles to do so. He kept a log book identifying the hours and other work on the days on which he was carrying out the truck driving. If he had not done the driving, Kidd Partnership would have paid someone else to do it. Mr Cowan was an...