CAC 304 v Morris [2016] NZREADT 35 [pdf, 124 KB]
...what I would describe as “mid-level” (say, up to $10,000 or up to two-thirds of the maximum fine)?” [10] He submits that the offending found by us merits a fine in the lower range; and that there are personal circumstances which support the plea for a lower range fine. [11] Mr Parmenter also submits that: “4. There were no adverse consequences for the MCT as a result of the conflict: a. The Church Street property, bought by Mr John Massam in his name, was settled by him o...