CAC 20005 v Drever [2014] NZREADT 101 [pdf, 40 KB]
...the basis of the summary of facts set out above as part of the amended charge. [4] We had absorbed the quite detailed briefs of the proposed witnesses for each party, and the detailed and helpful opening submissions, filed prior to the change in plea. The initial charges had relied on s.73(a) of the Act rather than s.73(b) as now pleaded. [5] Accordingly, the hearing before us focused on penalty. The Stance of the Prosecution [6] The complainant, Ms J Hedgman, is the proprietor...