LCRO 181/2017 FW and KP v BG (31 October 2019) [pdf, 173 KB]
...copyright issue, namely, use of the NZIA form which is reserved to NZIA Practices, with the functions or tasks of the person appointed to the role of architect described in the NZIA form. [84] In its statement of claim, the contractor included the plea, in effect, that because [Firm B] was not a NZIA Practice, its appointment as successor architect was invalid. Therefore, because there was no architect appointed, no payment schedule had been issued. In other words, the “paymen...