LCRO 209/2016 YH v SM (27 November 2018) [pdf, 144 KB]
...the Limitation Act was entirely defective”. In this regard Mrs YH is referring to the fact that Mr YH was able to argue that part of her claim was limited by the Limitation Act 1950. It is something of an exaggeration to convert this to the statement that the claim was defective. [20] Mr SM submits that by issuing proceedings against Mr YH, Mrs YH’s negotiating position was significantly improved. That cannot be disputed. [21] In response to a question from Mr Vaughan during...