Search Results

Search results for Statement of Defence.

3031 items matching your search terms

  1. Holmes v Housing New Zealand Corporation [2014] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 214 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 54 Reference No. HRRT 012/2012 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN GORDON HENRY HOLMES PLAINTIFF AND HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GH Holmes in person Ms CP Paterson for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 17, 18, 19 and 20 March 2014 DATE OF LAST SUBMI

  2. Leaders Real Estate (1987) Limited v CAC20008 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 41 [pdf, 155 KB]

    ...reliance on legal advice may offer an answer to an allegation of unsatisfactory conduct or misconduct, in certain circumstances, should have been readily apparent to the applicant; and, he puts it, is just a particular example of an absence of fault defence. [27] In final submissions, Mr Hodge focused on the following two points from Mr Matsis: [a] The argument that the 20 working day time limit in s.111(1) of Act is permissive; [b] The argument that the appeal provisions operate c...

  3. Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v M [2013] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...Committee (No 1) v McGuire3, that matters sought must relate to information that would be evidence on an issue arising in respect of the disciplinary charges faced, or which directly or indirectly enables the charged practitioner to advance his defence of the charges.4 [41] Mr M’s requests are directed at matters such as discovering who may have assisted the complainant follow through the complaints process, including the completion of a sworn statement by the complainant, and...

  4. Masefield v CAC301 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 282 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 30 READT 079/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LEIGH MASEFIELD Appellant/Licensee AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (per CAC 301) First respondent AND JOHN McHUGO and JENNIFER DONALD Second respondent/purchasers MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms N Dangen - Member HEARD at KAIKO

  5. [2017] NZEmpC 68 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...despite the defendant’s claimed privilege. (b) Application 4 – being an application by the plaintiff for particulars of discovery. (c) Application 5 – being an application by the plaintiff for further and better particulars of the statement of defence. (d) Application 6 – being an application by the defendant for orders in relation to discovery (part of this application relating to disclosure by a non-party has already been dealt with in the Court’s judgment of 29...

  6. [2023] NZEnvC 133 Bay of Islands Maritime Park Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    ...following people gave notice of their intention to become parties to one or more of the appeals under section 274 of the Act and have signed the memorandum of the parties dated 23 June 2023: (a) Patuharakeke Te Iwi Trust Board; (b) Minister of Defence; (c) Forest & Bird; (d) Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited; (e) Far North District Council; (f) Whangarei District Council; (g) Federated Farmers of New Zealand; (h) Messrs Dean Farmer, Christopher Mace and Philip Thornton;...

  7. [2007] NZEmpC AC 9/07 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union & Anor v Transport Auckland and Cityline (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 21 KB]

    ...[2002] 1 ERNZ 438 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly [2004] 1 ERNZ 172. The principles which the Court must adopt in exercising its discretion under s19 are well established by those authorities. The position is well encapsulated in the following statement from Alton-Lee at paragraph [48]: [48] The primary principle is that costs follow the event. As to quantification, the principle is one of reasonable contribution to costs actually and reasonably incurred. These principles reflect a...

  8. [2015] NZEmpC 131 Su v Zhang and iGolf Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

    ...allowing the challenge, the Court found that Ms Su was an employee of the first defendant. Certain remedies were granted including unpaid salary, interest and a penalty. The defendants did not take part in the challenge. They failed to file statements of defence and did not appear at the hearing. 1 Su v iGolf Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 66. 2 Su v iGolf Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 450. [2] In view of the award to Ms Su of unpai...

  9. Criminal Cases Review Commission: Appointments media release [pdf, 112 KB]

    ...Investigation Commission, member of the Broadcasting Standards Authority, Deputy Chair of Worksafe New Zealand and director of several non-governmental organisations including St John South Island Regional Trust Board. Kingi Snelgar is a criminal defence lawyer and youth advocate based in Manukau. He has whakapapa to Ngapuhi, Ngati Whakaue, Te Whakatohea and Ngai Tahu. Mr Snelgar has experience working in the justice system and has training that is contemporary and relevant to the CCRC...

  10. [2022] NZEmpC 203 Potgieter v Bliss Beauty NZ Ltd [pdf, 147 KB]

    ...certified that the grounds on which the application relies are made out and that all reasonable enquiries and all reasonable steps have been made or taken to ensure that the application contains all relevant information, including any opposition or defence that might be relied on by any other party, or any facts that would support the position of any other party. [4] I am satisfied that it is appropriate to proceed to deal with the application at this initial stage on an ex parte ba...