UF v OU LCRO 90 / 2011 (20 March 2013) [pdf, 118 KB]
...and in the affidavit, ZB and UG alleged that OU had failed to identify a conflict of interest in continuing to act for all defendants, and that “one person’s interests [were] being sacrificed in the interest of another”1 i.e. that ZB’s defence was being sacrificed for WR. [7] OU objected to these allegations, particularly as they had not been put before him to respond to before they were included in the Court documents. A telephone conversation between OU and UG took place...