Search Results

Search results for Statement of Defence.

3032 items matching your search terms

  1. [2023] NZEmpC 133 Chain & Rigging Supplies Ltd v Nikorima [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...taken from C&R; goods belonging to C&R; and evidence of activities which allegedly breach the obligations Mr Nikorima owed to C&R as an employee. [3] The application is supported by two comprehensive affidavits; a proposed statement of problem; undertakings from C&R; memoranda from counsel, Ms Amaranathan; as well as a draft order. I held two telephone directions conferences with counsel so as to check the proposed terms of the order, and to deal with two to...

  2. [2024] NZEmpC 5 MGE New Zealand 2010 Limited & McKay Ltd v Campbell [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...applicants as an employee. [3] The application is supported by comprehensive affidavits from Mr Edward Ashby, on behalf of the applicants; affidavits from the private investigator and a forensic technology and cyber security expert; a proposed statement of problem; undertakings from the applicants; memoranda from counsel, Mr Grindle; as well as a draft order. I held two telephone directions conferences with counsel to check the proposed terms of the order, and to deal with topics...

  3. Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...communication of this concession. He added that written confirmation of the concession would be given to the Tribunal. [7] The hearing was adjourned for the parties to confer. See the Minute issued by the Tribunal on 20 April 2018. In a later amended statement of reply dated 14 May 2018 liability under IPP 6 was formally admitted by ACC. [8] The delay in publishing the present decision is both acknowledged and regretted. The circumstances were explained to the parties by the Tribuna...

  4. Reekie v Attorney-General (for Department of Corrections) [2022] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...and multiple breaches of ss 9 and 21 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 that occurred on 12 March 2012. Mr Reekie and Corrections entered into a settlement of that claim on 3 July 2015 (the High Court Settlement). [11] While not mentioned in its statement of reply, Corrections submitted in its opening submissions that Mr Reekie’s action in bringing this claim before the Human Rights Review Tribunal may be in breach of the High Court Settlement. [12] As part of the High Court Settlem...

  5. ENVC combined interested party notices R to Y [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...over time. Some of high probability, some of low probability and high impact. Some effects arise in the course of constl'Uction. Those effects are contralY to the outcomes envisaged in the follow­ ing documents. The New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010. Ss. 5, 6 & 7 of ti,e Resource Management Act 1991. The Hauraki Gulf lvlarine Park Act 2000. Auckland Council Regional Coastal Plan, Auckland Council Regional Plan and Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement. The appl...

  6. IncreasingRevenuefromCourtsandTribunalFeesandCollectionsServices.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release: Increasing Revenue from Courts and Tribunal Fees and Collections Services Date of issue: 4 July 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted a

  7. [2014] NZEmpC 63 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...hearing are said to be records of an assessment of client A by a psychiatrist, whom I will refer to as “K”, engaged by the Board. Ms Bracewell says that she has become aware of the existence of such documents only recently as a result of a statement she says was made to her by the Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner. That statement was that the Chief Executive Officer of the Board reported to the Deputy Commissioner that a second assessment of client A’s competenc...

  8. Nicholls v Nicholls - Part Papaaroha 6B Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...it is not unprincipled or else it would be unacceptably arbitrary. 11 [10] It is therefore trite law that a discretion must be exercised judicially. While this Court in Matauri X referred to an absolute and unfettered discretion, we prefer the statement of principle found in Glaister and Shirley. In short, the exercise of a discretion will involve consideration of the correct principles, taking into account relevant matters and arriving at a decision that is not plainly wrong. [...

  9. UN v OL LCRO 49 / 2012 (9 April 2013) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...before the High Court Judge, the practitioner submitted that Mr UN owned property (land) overseas. Mr UN acknowledges that this submission is privileged (in the sense that it was made in the course of judicial proceedings and is thereby a complete defence to any claim for defamation). Mr UN told the Judge that he did not own any property either in New Zealand or overseas, and that his only income was National Superannuation. The High Court Judge accepted Mr UN’s submission ab...

  10. [2018] NZEnvC 019 Falvey v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...City Council declining an application to erect a dwelling and associated curtilage on the property at 9021 Rothesay Road, Christchurch. [2] This proceeding would have been a test case of the urban growth policies in the Canterbury Regional Policy Statement and the Christchurch District Plan (the r--,:---;--" Replacement Plan). Its outcome would have been of considerable importance not only /~<:- ~ ;,.fd. ',) F /' /G«'::';-:~~. tt!~<:\ to the parties bu...