Search Results

1. [2017] EmpC 156 Coomer v JA McCallum & Son Ltd [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...work as a delivery driver. While Mr Coomer was pursuing a constructive dismissal case closing submissions to the Authority invited it to consider an alternative personal grievance if one was thought to have occurred. [12] McCallum & Son’s defence was: (a) Mr Coomer was not entitled to payment for the hours worked because he was a volunteer; (b) while there was no signed employment agreement one had been provided to Mr Coomer. He had signed the “Drivers Responsibilities”...

2. QAB v PAC, OAD and NAE LCRO 93/2015, 94/2015 and 142/2016 [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...provide evidence of requests being made for the transcript of the Court proceedings which the respondents had advised the Standards Committee had not occurred. However, when a transcript of the Court hearing was obtained it became clear that the statement in Mr PAC’s letter was not correct and that has been accepted by all parties and the Standards Committee. Nothing further can be gained by having a witness confirm what is already known and accepted. [23] A review by the LCRO...

3. Eriwata - Waitara SD Section 6 and 91 Land Trust (2005) 155 Aotea MB 269 (155 AOT 269) [pdf, 575 KB]

   ...and subsequent correspondence from Ms Eriwata. For completeness I note that a letter signed by Ms Eriwata, but clearly written by Mr Allen, was also sent to the Court on 25 June 2005. In that letter, Mr Allen through Ms Eriwata, makes a number of statements concerning her rights as an owner in Maori freehold land to, essentially, enjoy same without recourse to any other party. Mr Allen in essence pursues an individual rights argument. He also continues with his claims against the trustee...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 84 BEO v Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...Vice-Chancellor submits: (a) That the Authority has not made any determination in relation to the application for an interim or permanent injunction, but rather has dealt with the preliminary issues of removal and non-publication. (b) The Authority’s statement at [53] did not amount to a “determination” that was capable of challenge. (c) If the claim was able to be considered by the Court, that would lead to an absurd outcome rendering the removal application redundant. T...

5. Holden v Hanns [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...There will be a pre- mediation conference on 05 October 2009 at 11.30 a.m. 69. If the mediation does not result in full settlement the case manager will contact the parties to confirm the dates for the following procedural steps. 70. All witness statements and evidence upon which the claimant seeks to rely is to be filed with the Tribunal by 30 October 2009. 71. All respondents are to file their witness statements and other evidence that they will seek to rely upon at the Tribunal...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 5 Bishop & Bishop v Bennett [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...hours of work. It was rendered on 31 May 2010, before any preparation for a hearing had been done and before the second pre-hearing conference. The only information about the work charged for is the narration on the invoice itself: Reviewing statement of claim and witness statement and taking your instructions in relation to the same; Drafting and filing statement of defence and cross challenge and serving the same on Mr and Mrs Bishop; Preparation for and attendance at Emplo...

7. BORA Privacy Bill [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...disclosure is authorised by the individual concerned.4 7. An individual may ask an agency holding their personal information to correct it. If an agency declines the individual is entitled to ask the agency to attach to personal information a statement of the correction sought. An agency must take such steps, if any, as are reasonable in the circumstances, to attach the statement of correction in such a manner that it will always be read with the information. The agency must also inf...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 165 Roach v Nazareth Care [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...determination as if s 179(1) of the Act applied. After discussion with counsel they accepted, in reality, it was an application for special leave pursuant to s 178(3) and should be decided on that basis. The hearing was conducted accordingly. Agreed statement of facts [4] There is no material dispute about what happened and an agreed statement of facts was filed for the purposes of this application. [5] Between 2008 and May 2016 Mr Roach was employed as a Business Manager by...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 28 Talbot Agriculture Ltd v Wate [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...judgment that the dismissal was justified. As an alternative it disputed the compensation the Authority ordered to be paid. 6 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 179(1) and (3). [10] The statement of claim pleaded that the period from 2 May to 4 May 2016, which the Authority had concluded was work time to be paid for, was actually to assess Mr Wate’s suitability for employment and there was a common understanding that he...

10. Electoral-Amendment-Bill-Supplementary-Order-Paper-Final.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...Amendment Bill and will be tabled in the House on 6 September 2022 for referral to the Justice Committee for its consideration. The Justice Committee is due to report back to the House on the Bill by 5 December 2022. Impact Analysis Regulatory Impact Statement 31 A Regulatory Impact Statement was prepared in accordance with Cabinet's impact analysis requirements and was submitted at the time Cabinet approval was sought on policy related to the Electoral Amendment Bill [Electora...