Search Results

1. CAC 10054 v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...the employer. The deponent tried to stop him but was sworn at by the defendant who suddenly gripped both the deponent’s arms, shook him twice, and forcibly threw him backwards shouting abuse at him. That was followed by subsequent threatening statements to the deponent from the defendant. The deponent was blocking the defendant’s way at one stage and the defendant suddenly grabbed the deponent and threw him against the photocopier while still abusing him. The Police were called.

2. Regulatory-Systems-Courts-Improvement-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 514 KB]

   ...convenient processes to be adopted. For example, electronic preliminary balloting could be undertaken in advance to significantly reduce the number of summoned jurors required to attend court in person. Impact analysis 12 A Regulatory Impact Statement for 23 amendments was prepared and submitted to Cabinet in July 2024 [SOU-24-MIN-0074]. The Ministry for Regulation has confirmed that the Regulatory Impact Analysis requirements do not apply to the remainder of the proposed amendments,...

3. [2015] NZEnvC 105 Opoutere Ratepayers and Residents' Association v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...Hearing at: Court: Appearances: Decision No. [2015] NZEnvC lOS IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) in relation to proposed changes to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement BETWEEN AND OPOUTERE RATEPAYERS AND RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION (ENV-2012-AKL-000253) Appellant W AIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent at Hamilton, 23 October 2014; 18 November 2014 and site visit on 19 November 2014...

4. [2007] NZEmpC WC 10B/07 Smith & Anor v Harvey [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...9 October 2006 (WA 132/06) and in the two interlocutory decisions of Judge Shaw dated 7 March 2007 (WC 10/07) and 7 August 2007 (WC 10A/07). [4] In essence, the plaintiffs took no part in the Authority’s investigation other than to file a statement in reply. As a result, when the plaintiffs challenged the Authority’s determination, a good faith report was called for pursuant to s181 of the Employment Relations Act 2000. After considering that report and the submissions of...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 226 Davis v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...which brought about his transfer to Christchurch and about his complaints against his supervisors there, that are the subject of this proceeding and judgment. The 13 September 2010 grievance – the pleadings [11] The plaintiff’s first amended statement of claim in CRC 31/13 filed on 2 October 2013 sets out the allegations against which the parties’ contentions must be judged. What is now re-labelled the 13 September 2010 grievance is covered by paras 10-19 of the plaintiff...

6. Karepa v Te Riini - The Kikorangi and Kareti Karepa Whānau Trust (2016) 138 Waiariki MB 134 (138 WAR 134) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...management of the trust fund has been sound and in line with the trust order. In particular: (i) Any receipt of funds, such as dividends, are deposited into the trust’s bank account to form part of the trust fund; (ii) The annual financial statements for the trust are prepared by an accountant and the statements for the years ending 31 March 2014 and 31 March 2015 have been produced to the Court; (iii) The financial statements show that funds in both the investment account an...

7. [2025] NZIACDT 14 - INZ v Ma (19 February 2025) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...professional disciplinary proceedings. However, the quality of the evidence required to meet that standard may differ in cogency, depending on the gravity of the charges.7 From the Registrar [25] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (25 March 2024), with a paginated file of supporting documents. From the complainant [26] There are no submissions from the complainant. From the adviser [27] There is a statement of reply (6 April 2024) from Ms Ma...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 32 NZ Meat Worker & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...finding was to be challenged in the application for judicial review now brought in the Court of Appeal. There it is alleged that the full Court relied upon findings of fact that were not comprised in or able to be reasonably inferred from the agreed statement of facts and agreed bundle of documents which were before that Court. Thus, he said, there was a possibility that the breach of good faith conclusions reached by the full Court could be set aside; or the entire matter could b...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 49 Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v ISO Ltd [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...no standing, but concluded the union’s participation as a party would be just.9 The challenge [10] MUNZ and Mr Seymour’s challenge to the 2019 determination elected to have the whole matter heard again.10 [11] While most of the statement of claim contained pleadings about the agreement between Mr Seymour and ISO, there is one paragraph dedicated to the relationship 5 At [25]. 6 2019 determination, above n 1, at [6]....

10. Hill v PTW Holdings Ltd - 587-591 Great South Road (2023) 262 Taitokerau MB 140 (262 TTK 140) [pdf, 275 KB]

    ...means that the Judge does not have the ability to dismiss or dispute it unless there are grounds to dispute the fact”. [57] This Court accepts that tikanga is now appropriately being recognised in our legal system. Applicants may of course make statements expressing their self-determination. I do not have to agree or accept those expressions. If they are making applications to this Court, then determinations are mine to make based on the evidence and submissions before me. [...