Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 230 Nelson-Marlborough Fish and Game Council v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 569 KB]

   ...resource and the natural and human usefreshwater values supported by the waterbody/bodies. These freshwater management units are identified in the MEP. This approach also gives effect to the National Objectives Framework of the National Policy Statement Freshwater Management 2014 (NPSFM), which requires the Council to identify freshwater management units. 5. Amend the explanation to Policy 5.1.2, as follows: [RPS, R] Policy 5.1.2 – Recognise that the taking of water and the use...

2. NO & NTO v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 44 (01 August 2013) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...interviews or other matters that would be pertinent to a genuine attempt to seek employment. The only material matter was to say that the complainant could not communicate in English, and job opportunities were accordingly restricted. [82.4] The statement “these documents would be issued to the client on full payment of the fee of $3,000” was not consistent with a genuine process of seeking employment. [83] The letter of 27 September 2011 containing a job offer, purportedly signed...

3. 2021-11-05 ORC - MOC - re chapter 6 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...been taken into account in the development of Chapter 6 of PC1 is set out in the section 32 Report for Chapter 6 of PC1.14 6 Chapter 6 of PC1 must give effect to:15 (a) The New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement; (b) Any applicable national policy statements, including of particular relevance, the National Policy Statement for Freshwater 11 RMA, s66(1)(a). 12 RMA, s66(1)(b). 13 Environmental Defence Society v New Zealand King Salmon [2014] NZSC 38 at [85]. 14 Section 32 Evaluati...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...if no agreement is reached shall be decided within the “disputes” clause of this agreement. j) Any local agreements now applying at sites shall not be considered inconsistent with this clause. (Emphasis added) [7] The plaintiff in its statement of claim seeks a finding from the Court that cl 30(f) of the collective agreement applies to the operation of the plants and not just to re-engagement and lay-offs so that, in the absence of certain disqualifying factors, seniority...

5. [2010] NZEmpC 79 Silver Fern Farms Ltd v North [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...Authority concluded that although an amended claim or amended claims may have been lodged with it after that three year period, it was the filing of the original proceeding within the three year period that satisfied the test. Mr North’s amended statement of problem did not raise any new substantive issue but, rather, included a claim for leave to file out of time in exceptional circumstances if this was required. That issue of compliance with the three year time limit has not b...

6. RM v LN LCRO 106 / 2011 (2 October 2012) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...By letter 14 February 2012 I advised the parties that I intended to meet with them for the purpose of ascertaining and examining which aspects of RM’s conduct LN considered was rude and discourteous. [41] On 13 April, this Office received two statements from LN. One statement was from LM which related to a meeting which took place at LN’s house on 14 November 2008, and one was from LL which also related to that meeting, as well as to the joint settlement conference. [42] Ot...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 46 Evans-Walsh v Southern District Health Board [pdf, 367 KB]

   ...competencies to assist in regulating the professional practice of registered nurses. They apply to all aspects of nursing practice. The competencies are stated in four “Domains of Competence” each one of which is amplified by explanatory statements of the expected competence; Domain 1 is professional responsibility, Domain 2 is management of nursing care, Domain 3 is interpersonal relationships and Domain 4 is inter-professional health care and quality improvement. [35] Th...

8. LCRO 68/2023 QB v VN (5 September 2024) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...against Ms VN and/or [Company A] or to disclose something about her or the company for any improper purpose, in breach of r 2.7 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules): and (b) did Mr QB’s statement go further than merely summarise views as to the likely consequences for Ms VN’s company in breaching his client’s employment agreement and breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act (WorkSafe NZ) unless a full and final settlement...

9. [2008] NZEmpC AC 39/08 Prins & Anor v Tirohanga Group Ltd (formerly Tirohanga Rural Estates Ltd) [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...alternatively, and as a fall-back position, for the period from 25 July 2002 (the date of the Calderbank offer) to 11 July 2003, being the conclusion of proceedings in the Authority. [6] The plaintiffs’ proceedings were commenced with the filing of their statement of problem on 11 December 2001 that were concluded in the Authority on 11 July 2003. The Authority’s investigation meeting began on 16 August and continued on 2 September and 21 October 2002. Written submissions were...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 69 H v A Limited Interlocutory [pdf, 77 KB]

    ...Authority to which it relates which may contain the names of, or otherwise identify the parties. [10] The plaintiff’s challenge to the Authority’s substantive determination is still in its very early stages. The defendant has not yet filed its statement of defence. Given the probable duration of the hearing of the challenge it is unlikely to be until late July 2014 at the earliest, and perhaps later, even without delays that may be occasioned if there are any other interloc...