Search Results

1. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual-updated.pdf [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...period of time between three months and two years. Legal Aid Providers will notify you in writing of the Secretary’s decision and the grounds and reasons for the decision. If your approval is cancelled, the notification will also include: • a statement about your right to seek a review • notification of the Ministry’s intention to publish cancelled approvals on its website • a statement informing you that the New Zealand Law Society will be informed of the cancellation and its...

2. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual.pdf [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...period of time between three months and two years. Legal Aid Providers will notify you in writing of the Secretary’s decision and the grounds and reasons for the decision. If your approval is cancelled, the notification will also include: • a statement about your right to seek a review • notification of the Ministry’s intention to publish cancelled approvals on its website • a statement informing you that the New Zealand Law Society will be informed of the cancellation and...

3. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual-Feb-2025.pdf [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...period of time between three months and two years. Legal Aid Providers will notify you in writing of the Secretary’s decision and the grounds and reasons for the decision. If your approval is cancelled, the notification will also include: • a statement about your right to seek a review • notification of the Ministry’s intention to publish cancelled approvals on its website • a statement informing you that the New Zealand Law Society will be informed of the cancellation and its...

4. Theobald v Coulter [pdf, 170 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 0300 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN ROSALIE JANE THEOBALD and DAVID KEITH THEOBALD Claimants AND SCOTT COULTER and KAREN COULTER First Respondents AND BAY BUILDING CERTIFIERS LIMITED Second Respondent AND No Third Respondent, the Tauranga District Council having been struck out AND RAY MARKLEW trading as MODERN TEXTURES Fourth Respondent AND No Fifth Respond

5. [2024] NZEmpC 123 Wiles v University of Auckland [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...University raised questions over Associate Professor Wiles’s “outside activities” ............................................................................................................. [57] Associate Professor Wiles’s claims are in her statement of claim ...................... [72] The University has a role as critic and conscience of society ............................. [80] The Collective Agreement addresses public commentary and academic freedom .........................

6. [2012] NZEmpC 17 Transpacific Industries Group (NZ) Ltd v Harris & Others [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...commission. [29] Transpacific is directed to file and serve within 20 working days after the date of this judgment a statement of claim complying with regulation 11 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000. The usual period for filing and serving statements of defence will then apply. Comment [30] This matter has become a test case about whether clause 7.1 is generally unenforceable. Mr Harris has been chosen by Transpacific as the individual defendant. That is unfortunate fo...

7. Taueki v Horowhenua Sailing Club Ltd - Horowhenua Lake 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation (2015) 337 Aotea MB 68 (337 AOT 68) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...action, defence, or case appropriate to the nature of the pleading; or (b) is likely to cause prejudice or delay; or (c) is frivolous or vexatious; or (d) is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court. (2) If the court strikes out a statement of claim or a counterclaim under subclause (1), it may by the same or a subsequent order dismiss the proceeding or the counterclaim. (3) Instead of striking out all or part of a pleading under subclause (1), the court may stay...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 3 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...than incidentally, in these proceedings and that there are no factors which would warrant an exercise of the residual discretion against removal.15 These conclusions are sufficient to decide the application, which is granted accordingly. [21] A statement of claim must be filed and served within 10 working days of the date of this judgment, with the usual timeframe for the filing and service of statements of defence. A telephone directions conference should then be convened with...

9. E72 Ngarimu Blair - EIC - Ngāti Whātua Orākei [pdf, 969 KB]

   ...resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF NGARIMU ALAN HUIROA BLAIR ON BEHALF OF: (A) NGĀTI WHĀTUA ORĀKEI WHAIA MAIA LTD; (B) SUPPORTING MANA WHENUA Rob Enright Barrister Magdalene Chambers Level 1, 28 Customs St East Britomart...

10. LCRO 166/2014 RD v TS (4 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...Service on NZ Police letterhead. He listed five areas of concern:4 1. Mr RD’s [sic] 5 inability to correctly and safely possess and then return in an appropriate and timely fashion a child witness DVD containing sensitive information 2. His statement more than once to Police that this DVD had been disposed of – “put in the rubbish” is unacceptable 3. His statement as to the DVD’s disposal was clearly not correct when the DVD was later located and returned by Mr RD 4....