Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 11 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...the parties at that stage, and counsel for LSG prepared their submissions for that hearing accordingly. [7] On 20 May 2016, six days prior to the hearing that had been set for the outstanding applications, the plaintiff filed a second amended statement of claim (Mr Matsuoka has subsequently and less controversially filed a third amended statement of claim). The second amended statement of claim was a substantial pleading. Its preparation and filing must have been in contemplatio...

2. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 551 KB]

   ...emergencies while also supporting the operation of the emergency management system. • As assurer (a new function) NEMA will provide assurance that the emergency management system is fit for purpose. NEMA’s responsibilities fall under the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002, the National Disaster Resilience Strategy, National CDEM Plan and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (DPMC’s) Strategic Intentions. 27 Structure NEMA is a departmental agency...

3. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...emergencies while also supporting the operation of the emergency management system. • As assurer (a new function) NEMA will provide assurance that the emergency management system is fit for purpose. NEMA’s responsibilities fall under the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002, the National Disaster Resilience Strategy, National CDEM Plan and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s (DPMC’s) Strategic Intentions. 30 Structure NEMA is a departmental a...

4. Waxman v Pal (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2017] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...$7,084.00. [8] Because Dr Jitendra Pal believed the tribunal hearing had taken place in his absence (the originally notified date of hearing was apparently changed) he appealed to the District Court. In support of that appeal he prepared a detailed defence referenced to the Best Doctor documents downloaded on the practice computer and to 22 transcripts of the 27 telephone calls made by Dr Waxman while at the Panmure surgery. By these means Dr Pal intended demonstrating the dismissal w...

5. Ministerial Advisory Group for Victims of Retail Crime - Final Report on Shoplifting [pdf, 390 KB]

   ...bollards to protect against ramraids or high-value targets, such as cash, from stores); and/or • enhancing the justice’s system’s ability to hold offenders accountable. 1 https://retail.kiwi/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/RetailNZPositionStatement-RetailCrime- September2023.pdf?utm_source=pdf&utm_medium=button&utm_campaign=position-statement 2 Situational-Crime-Prevention.pdf 2017 Evidence Brief, Sector Group, Ministry of Justice. https://retail.kiwi/wp-content/uploads/20...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 135 Nathan v Broadspectrum [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...Investigation Report was criticised as using incorrect information, drawing wrong conclusions and containing errors. The outcome of the final meeting between Mr Nathan and Mr Proffitt was challenged as predetermined and remedies were sought including reinstatement. [15] Broadspectrum responded on 28 February 2014 saying that what was in issue was the procedure followed by Mr Nathan in planning and carrying out the repair work. It declined to grant the remedies claimed. [16]...

7. Finn and Anor as Trustees of the Angela Poynter Trust v Chen [2011] NZWHT Auckland 40 [pdf, 261 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000078 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 40 BETWEEN JOHN JOSEPH FINN AND ANGELA MARGARET POYNTER AND SHANNON MARIE JONES as Trustees of the ANGELA POYNTER TRUST Claimants AND YUE MIN WANG (Deceased) First Respondent AND XU DONG CHEN Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND COLIN HENRY THOMPSON & SALLYANN THOMPSON (Claim Withdrawn) Fourth Respondents AND PURE REALTY LIMITE

8. LCRO 121/2017 PT v BD (25 July 2018) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...instructed him to act on behalf of MOH Ltd to defend the EFI Ltd litigation. [9] Mr BD advised MOH Ltd that grounds existed for it to file a counterclaim against EFI Ltd. [10] MOH Ltd and Mr BD agreed that Mr BD would review the evidence and prepare a statement of defence to the EFI Ltd litigation, and prepare a counterclaim to be filed and served on EFI Ltd. It was agreed that this work would be completed for a fixed fee of $30,000 plus GST (the fixed fee arrangement). [11] At t...

9. [2010] NZEmpC 18 C v Air Nelson Ltd [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...Relations Authority. Here, also, there is no argument that the events about which the plaintiff is very embarrassed, took place. His contention is that they were consensual. Justification for dismissal, together with the practicability of reinstatement if dismissal was unjustified, will be the issues for the Court They will not turn on that distinction about consent, just as the employer’s reasons for dismissal did not. [21] Finally, even though, as Mr Haigh says, the plaintif...

10. Sionepulu v Downer and Police (Costs) [2012] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 76 KB]

    ...to make. 4 [12] Mr Butler can be both cooperative and aggressive. It is through him that an original claim for $7,000 was transformed first into $50,000 (see the email dated 15 July 2011) and then later into an improbable $100,000 (see the statement of claim at p 6). He is not a man who wears disappointment easily. The following description of his behaviour at the conclusion of the hearing appears in the Downer submissions on costs: Mr Butler was disrespectful, threatening and...