Search Results

1. NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Strike-Out Application) [2015] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...(NZPPSL) in support of an intended private prosecution against Mr Key alleging male assaults female. The rejection of the charging document was based on a failure by NZPPSL to comply with an earlier direction given on 1 May 2015 that it file formal statements in support of the allegations. [3] These present proceedings before the Human Rights Review Tribunal followed. It is alleged Mr Key breached s 62(2) of the Human Rights Act 1993. The statement of claim describes the plaintiff as...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 138 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [pdf, 415 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS UNION INC v MICHAEL ANTHONY TALLEY NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 138 [7 August 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 138 EMPC 112/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS UNION INC Plaintiff AND SOUTH PACIFIC MEATS LIMITED First Defendant AND MICHAEL ANTHONY TALLEY Second Defendant Hearing: 10 J

3. LCRO 126/2023 EG v HJ (28 November 2023) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...whether [the respondent] has justification for the caveat that he applied against the property owned by my solely owned company3 and if so, on what basis. I want to know if a lawyer can be punished for filing a complaint to the High Court with false statements? [The respondent] evidently lodged untruthful statement to the High Court. This to me is utterly fearful not only for my ongoing case between [the respondent] and his client but for him practising law unworthy to the court. [Th...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 82 Smith Crane and Construction Ltd v Hall [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...into before, and not after (even shortly after) work commences. Counsel submitted that these conclusions were directly applicable in the present circumstances. e) With regard to the claim in estoppel, an analysis of the facts suggested the statements made by Mr Hall were well short of amounting to a representation. Given the absence of signing on the standard IEA when the letter of offer was returned, it was not reasonable to conclude that the employer relied on any apparent...

5. AR v ZE LCRO 83/2012 (6 May 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...her clients. At the review hearing Mr NS advanced the view that Mr AR’s actions were driven by a desire to take advantage of the incorrect invoice issued by the firm and to hold the firm to the pre 1 July fees. I can only assume that Mr NS’s statements reflect Ms ZE’s views, both at the time, and now. That being the case, Ms ZE acted to protect the firm’s fees. [80] The amount at issue in relation to the sale was $57. Ms ZE was protected for her fees on the purchase by the...

6. 2017 NZSSAA 052 (15 September 2017) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...Manager, Contact Centre Services of the Ministry of Social Development. This memorandum was addressed to the Chair of this Authority. It was neither addressed to nor supplied to the appellant. On the contrary, the memorandum was headed with the statement “Security Level: In Confidence”. 2 [4] At this point, for the first time, it became apparent to the Authority that the seven decisions of Benefits Review Committees may not be the true record of the decisions the...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 117 Hutchison v Nelson City Council re-issued [pdf, 222 KB]

   ROBYN ANN HUTCHISON v NELSON CITY COUNCIL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 117 CRC 9/13 [9 July 2014, re-issued on 11 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 117 CRC 9/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ROBYN ANN HUTCHISON Plaintiff AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: 9, 10 and 11 June 2014 (heard at Nelson) Appearanc

8. Regulatory impact statement: Review of family violence legislation [pdf, 300 KB]

   1 Review of family violence legislation: Regulatory impact statement Agency Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory impact statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options for strengthening legislation to better respond to family violence in New Zealand. Key constraints are set out below. 2. Focus on regulatory change: The scope of the review is strengthening family violence legislation. Overall, this restricted the consideration...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 188 The Warehouse Ltd v Harris [pdf, 501 KB]

   ...………………………………………………………………….. [1] Relevant facts ………………………………………………………………... [5] The Authority’s determination ………………………………………………. [50] The employee’s grounds of challenge and defence ………………………….. [57] TWL’s grounds of challenge and defence …………………………………… [60] What to do with the complaint letter? …...

10. [2015] NZEnvC 137 Tram Lease v Auckland Transport and Auckland Council [pdf, 813 KB]

    ...flavour came a related concern for us, that much of the evidence amounted to advocacy, contrary to the expectations of the Court in its December 2014 Practice Note guiding the work of expert witnesses. [98] These approaches led him to offer such statements as: 14 ... AT fails to recognise or acknowledge such effects. The reality is that an experienced infrastructure provider would realise that such effects are sufficiently significant to warrant a pragmatic approach that involves &quo...