Search Results

1. 2018 to 2023 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...licence terms. To see a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 39 of the Public Finance Act 1989 E.64 SOI 1 Contents Minister of Justice’s statement .......................................................................................... 2 Secretary for Justice’s statement ...................................................................................... 3 Our purpose ......

2. [2024] NZEmpC 212 Kavallaris v Inframax Construction Ltd [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...Greenwood was not found to be the agent of Mr Kavallaris when she sent the 22 April 2024 email, he cannot be disciplined for sending the email. (b) Even without the protections provided by a protected disclosure to Mr Kavallaris and Ms Greenwood, the statements made in the email were not defamatory and relied on the defence of qualified privilege. [27] On 10 June 2024, Mr Ryan wrote to Mr Kavallaris setting out his preliminary view that the allegations were substantiated, that th...

3. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...effective Policing would be undermined if information provided to Police for investigation purposes is given to third parties. No expert evidence was offered to support those assertions. [85] Mr Jones says if the Transcript becomes public, some defence lawyers may advise their clients not to make a statement to Police and points to a ‘chilling effect’. He notes that in a criminal prosecution context, the complainant would not receive a copy of the accused’s statement and t...

4. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Netsafe Inc [2022] NZHRRT 15 (Removal of Certain Redactions After Appeal Period) [pdf, 511 KB]

   1 (1) PERMANENT ORDERS PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED INDIVIDUALS AND EVIDENCE GIVEN BY MR COCKER AT PARAGRAPH 7 OF HIS WITNESS STATEMENT DATED 18 JUNE 2019 (2) PERMANENT ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 15 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 040/2018 UNDER

5. [2020] NZEnvC 180 The Trustees of the Motiti Rohe Moana Trust v Bay of Plenty Regional Council.pdf [pdf, 541 KB]

   , ' '.~- ' BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl TA.MAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 181) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an application under s 31 O of the RMA THE TRUSTEES OF THE MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-000055) Applicant BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under ss 265(

6. [2024] NZEnvC 185 Transpower New Zealand Limited v Central Hawkes Bay District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   Proposed Central Hawke's Bay District Plan IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 185 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TRANSPOWER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000113) FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2023-AKL-000114) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2023-AKL-0000116)

7. MfE - Supplementary - T A D Ensor - Planning (18 March 2021) - Appendix A [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...flow  10  4.7  Rationing at times of low flow  10  4.8  Fish screen  10  4.9  Conveyance system  10  4.10  Issues raised by submitters  11  4.11  National environment standards and other regulations  11  4.12  National policy statements  12  4.13  Regional Policy Statement  13  4.14  Regional plans  13  4.14.1  Operative Regional Plan  13  4.14.2  Proposed Plan Change 7  13  4.15  Iwi and hapū management plans  14  4.16  Other matters  14  6 ...

8. Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Part Reservation Trust v Taueki - The Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block (2015) 343 Aotea MB 254 (343 AOT 254) [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...relies upon a finding of the Supreme Court in a case concerning whether or not Mr Taueki could claim peaceable possession of domain land adjacent to Lake Horowhenua. 15 Whether or not Mr Taueki could claim peaceable possession was central to his defence to a charge of assault. The Supreme Court held: 16 While the Reserves and Other Lands Disposal Act reserved to the Māori owners, of whom Mr Taueki was one, the “free and unrestricted use” of the lake and domain, this righ...

9. MacGregor v Craig (Second Interim Non-Publication Order) [2015] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...has the heading “Mutual Resolution”, and contains a cross-reference to s 83 of the Act. Significantly for present purposes the agreement specifically provides: [8.1] Neither party will make comment to the media or third parties other than a statement that the parties had met and had resolved their differences. [8.2] The terms of the document were to be “strictly confidential between the parties”. [9] On or about 9 June 2015 Ms MacGregor became aware Mr Craig had spoken about...

10. [2019] NZREADT 53 - Nottingham & Ors (26 November 2019) [pdf, 274 KB]

    ...into account: namely, it appeared to have misunderstood the evidence given by Mrs West (a salesperson formerly employed by Mr Honey), and had failed to consider the evidence of Mrs Earlam2 and Mrs Muller (both former employees of Mr Honey) whose statements were provided to the Tribunal after the hearing of evidence was completed, but before final submissions were completed.3 In a further judgment delivered on 21 August 2015, Justice Thomas directed that:4 … the matter should be...