Search Results

1. [2021] NZREADT 54 – Complaints Assessment Committee 2106 v Mathers (6 December 2021) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...information to Ms Mather’s personal computer. Ms Mather additionally exported a list of client contacts to her personal email address. This all occurred immediately before she left the agency to join another real estate firm. [4] Ms Mather’s defence was that she reasonably believed the information to belong to her and she was entitled to transfer it. Once advised she was not able to use it, she took reasonable steps to delete it. [5] On 30 June 2021, the Committee charged...

2. 17 February 2025 Selwyn DC v Ministry of Defence [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court EC4240_NoticeOfSessionListOfParties Appeals regarding the West Melton Rifle Range. ENV-2024-308-000031 1. i. ii. Topic: Topic Number: New Zealand Defence Force v Selwyn District Council Selwyn District Council v Minister of Defence Appeal By Submitter On Proposed Policy Statement Or Plan pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 Appeal...

3. Satnam Singh v Shane Singh and Scorpion Liquor [2015] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...dignity, and injury to the feelings of the plaintiff. [4] A claim that the plaintiff was discriminated against in his employment was withdrawn by the Director on 17 October 2014, a month before the hearing. No steps taken by defendants [5] The statement of claim was filed on 5 November 2013. On 6 November 2013 each defendant was sent a Notice of Proceeding together with a copy of the statement of claim. They were advised that in terms of Regulation 15 of the Human Rights Review Trib...

4. EMPC Form 12 - Defendants management memorandum [doc, 46 KB]

   ...…………………………………………………………………………………………. 5) …………………………………………………………………………………………. 6) …………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Brief statement of facts [State the facts essential to the defence.] ……………………………………………………………………………………………...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Mitchell, counsel for plaintiffs P Wicks QC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 August 2015 ORAL INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The plaintiffs have applied for leave to file and serve a second amended statement of claim in circumstances where the proceeding has been set down for hearing and is scheduled to commence a little less than two months hence. The defendant opposes the application for leave. [2] The proceeding was filed ur...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 149 Nasar v Expert IT Group Ltd [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...ought to be joined to the proceeding.1 [3] Mr Nasar has challenged the Authority’s determination on a de novo basis. [4] Mr Nasar was able to serve Expert IT on 16 January 2023 but was not able to serve Mr Sharif. Expert IT has not filed a statement of defence. [5] An affidavit has now been filed by a process server who advises that he served the documents on Expert IT at its registered office on Wednesday, 2 August 2023, delivering the documents to a person who identified the...

7. Before the trial

   On this page: Oliver gets a lawyer Oliver enters a plea Oliver on bail What happens to Oliver between appearances Oliver breaches bail Case management discussions Case review hearing Trial call-over memo Call-over Prosecution and defence prepare Oliver's past – inadmissible evidence High Court appeal for inadmissible evidence is lost   Oliver gets a lawyer The next day, the day of his first appearance in court, Oliver talks to a duty lawyer, sometimes called a 'duty solicitor'. Th...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Learn about the justice system >
   3. Explore the criminal justice system

8. Tabram v Slater [pdf, 24 KB]

   ...against the designer, the second respondent (Ojo Limited) in tort. By way of cross-claim, the Slaters claimed against Ojo Limited, and the fourth respondent, Mineral Plaster Technologies Limited (Mineral Plaster) – the company that issued a producer statement for the plaster cladding. Summary of Facts • February 2001: Mr Slater applied to the Rodney District Council (Council) for building consent • 21 June 2001: Council issued building consent • June 2001 – May 2004: perio...

9. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Arman [2020] NZLCDT 17 (22 June 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...(c) Ensure that Mr F’s decision to plead guilty to the amended charge was made on a fully informed basis, contrary to rr 13.3 and 13.13.1.” [10] The complainant had agreed to an interview with the police before engaging the practitioner. The statements made in the interview ought to have alerted the practitioner to possible defences for his client. However, Mr Arman did not obtain a copy of the police interview it would seem, choosing simply to focus on the client’s wish to...

10. Sexual Violence Legislation Bill [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...will be for the Judge to decide the nature of any direction that may be required (to ensure fairness for all parties involved). There is no inconsistency with the Bill of Rights Act. Better protecting complainants when they present victim impact statements Alternative manner of presenting the victim impact statement 30. Clause 22 of the Bill replaces s 22A of the Victims’ Rights Act. The new provision lists the alternative ways in which all or part of a victim impact statement ma...