Search Results

1. Family Court E solution Amendment Rules 2024 PCO26422 v1.23 4 December 2024 Consultation version.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   Family Court (E-solution) Amendment Rules 2024 Governor-General Order in Council At Wellington this day of 2024 Present: in Council These rules are made under section 16A of the Family Court Act 1980 on the advice and with the consent of the Executive Council. Contents Page 1 Title 4 2 Commencement 4 3 Principal rules 4 4 Rule 4 amended (Overview of these rules) 5 5 Rule 5 amended (Application of these rules) 5 6 New rule 7A inserted (Transitional, savings, and related provisions) 5

2. NOP TUV v MBIE [2014] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...and there are a number of communications between INZ and the Police. In addition, by letter dated 13 September 2002 (received on 17 September 2002) NZ Immigration Solutions Ltd submitted information that had been requested by INZ including a bank statement (relevant to proof of custody of the child), a letter dated 25 October 2001 from Child Youth and Family advising (inter alia) that there were no further care and protection concerns for the child and a letter (undated) from St Anthony�...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 059 Bunnings Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...application and the context of the site 1.3 The issues 1 .4 The matters to be considered 1.5 The direct effects of the proposal and of the status quo The relevant statutory instruments 2.1 The Operative District Plan (ODP) 2.2 National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity 2016 2.3 The regional documents 2.4 The Proposed District Plan (PDP) What is the effect of the proposal on industrial land capacity? 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The figures on zoned industrial land cap...

4. Beatson v CAC 416, Cripsin, Mordaunt & Property Brokers Ltd [2019] NZREADT 25 (9 July 2019) [pdf, 521 KB]

   ...giving evidence before a Committee, in this case, though, it is clear that assertions that the licensee had behaved fraudulently should have been notified to the licensee in advance of the hearing. He would then have been able to give evidence in defence. Further, he should have been given an opportunity to cross-examine his accuser. The Committee would also have had the opportunity to observe him under cross- examination. Quite apart from the interests of the parties, there are v...

5. LCRO 178/2021 AA v EL (26 November 2021) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...not wishing to engage in the sort of sensible commercial discussion that you and I have every day on cases, is that your client is a [Asian] businessman and “this is a matter of honour to him” (OP/JB on 29 October 2020). It is trite, JB, but statements of this ilk could be made by nearly all litigating parties in nearly any civil case that has ever occurred. But usually, and with the benefit of wise counsel, all litigating parties can come to see the inescapable advantages of dealin...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 138 The 20 District Health Boards v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...agreement, provision is made for adjudication by a clinical expert. The adjudication process occurred over the weekend of 7 – 8 August 2021, with determinations being issued on 9 August 2021 in respect of some 18 DHBs.5 The hearing [21] In its statement of claim, the DHBs sought three declarations; these were similar, but not identical, to the form of the declarations which had been sought in the Authority. It also sought a compliance order against the Union, essentially on th...

7. RM ND and DD v EQC & VERO Insurance New Zealand Ltd (substantive) [2022] CEIT-2019-0074 [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...[1] The property [15] Procedural background [27] Statutory and contractual framework [31] Legal principles [53] Approach to repairs [70] Issues [75] Policy exclusions [76] Statements exclusion [83] CES damage [160] Weathertightness experts’ joint report [168] Structural engineers’ joint report [171] Stonemason experts’ joint report [174] Repairs required

8. Proactive-Release_Bail-Electronic-Monitoring-Amendment-Act-2025.pdf [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   Hon Paul Goldsmith Minister of Justice Proactive release - Bail (Electronic Monitoring) Amendment Act 2025 Date of issue: 9 June 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circu lar CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been

9. [2009] NZEmpC WC 14/09 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...and (v) the date on which the agreement expires or an event on the occurrence of which the agreement is to expire; and (b) must not contain anything— (i) contrary to law; or (ii) inconsistent with this Act. [24] AFFCO’s primary defence is that an agreement will no longer apply after it is expressed to expire. In terms of the law of contract, the union accepts that will normally be so. The union says, however, that because the trial agreement was a collective agree...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 137 Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd costs [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...dealt with on an opposed basis. In the event, and following a relatively brief telephone hearing, an order was made enabling a witness to give their evidence in advance of the hearing. Mrs Stevens also advanced a successful application to file a statement of defence out of time in relation to the costs challenge. Hapag-Lloyd took a neutral position on the application and so could not reasonably have incurred any significant cost on it. The attendance of counsel was also required a...