Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 166 Alim v Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...could be removed from the Register, at a prompt hearing which was scheduled to take place on 25 August 2016. At such a hearing, all affected parties could be heard. [6] In its further application, LSG also sought orders: a) That Ms Alim’s statement of claim including her claim for costs be struck out, and that her challenge to the costs determination made by the Authority also be struck out, on the basis she had repeatedly failed to comply with the Court’s orders as to disc...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 045 Gray v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 527 KB]

   GRAY & SINCLAIR-GRAY v DCC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 45 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN G S GRAY AND K M SINCLAIR- GRAY (ENV-2022-CHC-024) Appellants AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: at Dunedin on 14 December 2022 Appearance

3. Zagorski v Wilkinson Building and Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 234 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2010-100-000112 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 4 BETWEEN ROGER JERZY AND SAMANTHA KAY ZAGORSKI Claimant AND WILKINSON BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND ALLIED HOUSE INSPECTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RICHARD ANDREW JOHN WILKINSON Fourth Respondent AND CATHERINE WILKINSON Fifth Respondent AND TIMOTHY JOHN BURCHER Sixth Respondent AND HITEX BUIL

4. Tangi v ACC [2012] NZACA 4 [pdf, 119 KB]

   [2012] NZACA 4 (ACA 004/09) IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN TANIELA TANGI of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 9 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr H

5. Meulenbroek v Vision Antenna Systems Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 226 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT [51] Reference No. HRRT 020/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARK CHRISTOPHER MEULENBROEK PLAINTIFF AND VISION ANTENNA SYSTEMS LIMITED DEFENDANT AT INVERCARGILL BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee and Ms JV Emerson for plaintiff Ms RK Brazil and Ms H Young for defendant DATE OF HEARING:

6. Folwell & Anor as Trustees of the Paul and Pauline Folwell Family Trust v NC Developers Ltd 2010] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 269 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000052 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN PAUL AND PAULINE FOLWELL as TRUSTEES OF THE PAUL AND PAULINE FOLWELL FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND NC DEVELOPERS LIMITED First Respondent AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND NIGEL ENGLAND Third Respondent Hearing: Tuesday 2 March 2010 Final Submissions received: Friday 5 March 2010 Appearances: Mr David Watson, WHRS Assessor Mr Paul Folwell,

7. [2019] NZEmpC 151 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...factual matrix leading to his dismissal, and compensation was therefore dealt with on a global basis. 28 At [61]. 29 At [64]. [59] The Authority recorded that Mr Zhang had denied his statements concerning Ms Sim were the product of an emotional outburst in response to the proposal. It said that those matters did not therefore inform the Authority’s assessment as to the impact of the dismissal, and its surrounding proce...

8. Bacic v Tulip Holdings Limited (in liq) [pdf, 110 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000046 BETWEEN BORIS and GIORDANA BACIC Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED (previously named Buildcorp Holdings Ltd) (In liquidation & removed) First Respondent AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND JAMES MICHAEL FAIRGRAY Third Respondent AND RICHARD ARTHUR ZGIERSKI- BOREYKO Fourth Respondent AND MALCOM BROWN MURRAY DAY ARCHITECTS (Removed 5 August 2008) Fifth Respondent AND SEAN LAK

9. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   437 Aotea MB 86 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004434 A20180004854 A20180006936 WĀHANGA Under Sections 43, 19(1)(a), (b), (c), 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block I WAENGA I A Between PHILLIP TAUEKI AND CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW

10. [2019] NZEnvC 205 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

    ...relief as to various DV provisions is expressed in their notices of appeal. Furthermore, in several cases, initial planning opinions about these matters has been overtaken by outcomes of planning witness conferencing , as recorded in joint witness statements. Through the hearing, such opinions evolved further in many cases, in response to cross­ examination and court questioning of witnesses. The extent of that evolution is reflected in QLDC's closing version of provisions, and...