3030 items matching your search terms
Supplementary Government Response to Law Commission report on Review of the Privacy Act 1993 Presented to the House of Representatives 2 Supplementary Government response to Law Commission report on Review of the Privacy Act 1993 Introduction The Government has considered the Law Commission’s report Review of the Privacy Act 1993 (NZLC 123) tabled in the House of Representative
95 Waiariki MB 176 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20080003007 A20080012477 A20120010123 UNDER Sections 231, 238 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 39A Sec. 2A Parish of Matatā and Lot 39A Sec. 2B No. 2B No. 2A Parish of Matatā BETWEEN HELEN MARIA SAVAGE AND RAELYN ARIHIA PEITA AS TRUSTEES OF THE OTONGA WHĀNAU TRUST Applicants AND RAE BEVERLY ADLAM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE MATATĀ PA
...Mr Marriott requested the Court to find that he had been unjustifiably dismissed, and that he was entitled to remuneration for lost wages, distress compensation as well as a penalty. [37] Having regard to the parties’ pleadings, the statement of issues filed by counsel and the submissions, I identify the following issues for resolution: a) Was the dismissal justified according to the test of justification in s 103A of the Act on procedural and/or substantive grounds? b...
Appendix One: Less substantive recommendations Part A: Recommendations to be implemented Law Commission recommendations # Recommendation Discussion and impacts 3 The Privacy Act should have a purpose section, with specific clauses as drafted by the Law Commission Agree the new Act should have a new purpose section. Final wording (agreed during drafting) will build upon the Law Commission’s suggestions and focus on balancing privacy interests with important social and busi
...hou te tautuhi mā te ara kōhure pērā i ngā reta tāmiramira, ngā tītaha, te tāraro rānei. Me whakakōnae me te tuku ngā tārua mākahia, wātea hoki. Me whai te inoi panoni i muri i roto i te upoko te nama tika, hei tauira “Second amended statement of claim”. Hoki ki mua 11 | P a g e 10. Ngā tauākī wawao ki ngā tauākī kerēme panoni 1) E whai ana i te tikanga o te Kōti Teitei i raro i te High Court r 7.77, e hāngai ana ngā tepenga wā ki te whakak...
...of turanga in establishing a claim for membership of a tribe and suggested that the whakapapa evidence shouldbe re-examined on the basis of tikanga and turanga. In its deliberations the Court has undertaken some research and also recalled certainstatements before the Court relevant to this issue. It records these so as to assist Ngiiti Paoa when it comes to undertake its own investigation, The references are not intended to show Court support for one or other of the views propounded. At...
...arrangement on trans-Tasman deportations 28/09/2015 Refused in full under s18(d). Publicly available at: beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Q%26A-Information- sharing-arrangement-on-deported-offenders.pdf 14 Policy Document Regulatory Impact Statement: Management of Offenders Returning to New Zealand 12/10/2015 Refused in full under s18(d). Publicly available at: justice.govt.nz/assets/Regulatory-Impact-Statement- Management-of-offenders-returning-to-New-Zealand.pdf 15 Aide Me...
...makes clear by reference to the phrase in s 103A (“in all the circumstances at the time the dismissal or action occurred”) that these are irrelevant to the matter of justification. They may, however, have been relevant to the remedy of reinstatement but this is not sought by Ms Martin. They may also be relevant to the question in relation to remedies of the contribution, if any, that Ms Martin made to the circumstances that led to her dismissal. [26] Although expressed at...
...the opportunity to discuss the position. When we resumed the hearing after an adjournment Mr Brant advised that his instructions were that he was not to lead any further evidence and was not to cross-examine Mrs Kirkley or any other defence witnesses. In particular he was not to lead any evidence from the doctors. His instructions were that his client would prefer to have an oral judgment delivered immediately and would pay what was required. He said that the completion...
...section 25 (b), it seemed irrelevant whether the delay was caused by a delay in the victim reporting the offence or by dilatory conduct by the prosecution. The critical point was whether the defendant had been prejudiced in the preparation of his or her defence by the lapse of time. 42. Mr. CAUGHLEY (New Zealand), responding to the question by Mr. Scheinin on whether the New Zealand Government had taken a position in relation to future requests for interim measures of protection from a...