Search Results

1. Tau v Tahere - Rangihamama X3A (2016) 137 Taitokerau MB 68 (137 TTK 68) [pdf, 494 KB]

   ...test of satisfactory performance need not be judged solely on objective standards. The Court is entitled to consider the nature of the trust, its performance and the views of the owners in coming to a determination.” I still concur with that statement and my view is reinforced by the statutory provisions that I have just referred to. That is not to say that the Court must blindly follow the wishes of the owners. There must still be grounds under section 240 for the Court to exerci...

2. Tribunal Guidelines [pdf, 674 KB]

   Tribunal Guidelines Choosing the right decision-making body Equipping tribunals to operate effectively Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or e

3. [2017] NZEmpC 85 Ramkissoon v Commissioner of New Zealand Police [pdf, 668 KB]

   ...appointment review grievance ………... [276] 10. Decision of rehabilitation management grievance ………………………... [313] 11. Decision of unjustified dismissal grievance ………………………………. [325] 12. Remedies: Reinstatement …………………………………………………………… Compensation …………………………………………………………… [327] [337] 13. Costs ………………………………………...

4. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...it comes to content and the evidence to support it. In the present case the cartoons could not be supported by evidence. They were not works of a high standard. Instead “we have been presented with an imbedded nastiness, and predictably dumb defence couched under the ambit of free speech”. The cartoons also took a view directed by the majority lens of (white people) which was able to shape and continue existing stereotypes which were damaging and did not in any way try to sort out...

5. 2021-05-26 Transcript (up until 3.15pm on day 32) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 17 May 2021 in Dunedin Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Comm

6. 2021-05-26 Transcript (up until 3.15pm on day 32) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 17 May 2021 in Dunedin Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Comm

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   W h a i a t e M a n a M o t u h a k e i n P u r s u i t o f M a n a M o t u h a k e Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W a i 2 4

8. [2022] NZEnvC 075 Otago Regional Council v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 27 MB]

   OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL V QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 75 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-CHC-070) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at

9. Beef + Lamb NZ - EiC - A N Burtt - Economic (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...number of stock units increased by over 20 per cent. 7 EVIDENCE 18. The economic principles discussed in this document are broad economic principles as they relate to the general direction in PC7. 19. The data discussed in this evidence statement largely comes from the B+LNZ Sheep and Beef Farm Survey, which is conducted by B+LNZ’s Economic Service. 20. B+LNZ’s Economic Service provides credible, authoritative and independent information analysis about the sheep and be...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 237 View West Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...amenity values also impact upon the welfare of people. Whether public safety will justify demolition in any particular case turns on the facts. [S2] The final decision in Lambton Quay is testament to the fact that identification of Environmental Defence Society Inc v New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] NZSC 38 at [88]. Cicero, De Legibus Book III Part III Sub. VIII. 14 public safety issues is not in itself a veto on restoration or maintenance of a building.6 [53] However, at p...