Search Results

1. VUW v Accident Compensation Corporation & QRS (Jurisdiction Objection) [2014] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...storage and security of health information. The Privacy Commissioner concluded there was no such breach. [2] In a statement of reply filed on 8 August 2013 ACC admits that the file was stolen but denies any breach of legal duty. The affirmative defences pleaded are: [2.1] ACC took such steps as were reasonable in the circumstances to take to ensure health information about the plaintiff was protected against loss, access, use, modification, or disclosure and other misuse. [2.2] ACC...

2. 18 June 2018 Thames Coromandel PDP Subdivision General [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. Topic: Topic Number: Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v Thames-Coromandel District Council Appeal By Submitter On Proposed Policy Statement Or Plan pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2016-AKL-000147...

3. 04 July 2018 Thames-Coromandel PDP Subdivision General [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. Topic: Topic Number: Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v Thames-Coromandel District Council Appeal By Submitter On Proposed Policy Statement Or Plan pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2016-AKL-000147...

4. MAG-Final-report-on-workstream-1.pdf [pdf, 622 KB]

   ...community against growing crime; not just directed at retailers, but movable property in general. This analysis is focussed on reforming justifications to arrest without warrant, so-called ‘citizens’ arrest’, and what force is reasonable in defence of movable property, land and buildings. The defence of a dwelling house is out of scope. • The status quo reflects a criminal code dating from the 19th Century and wording dating back to the former Criminal Code Act 1893; •...

5. LCRO 17/2025 ZG v MY (16 April 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...unfounded and gratuitous accusations. This is not acceptable. It is an abuse of the Tribunal’s processes. It must cease. … [7] [Mr ZG] is not to file in the Tribunal, any further emails or documents containing scandalous, offensive, or abusive statements or allegations. He is entitled to pursue his defence but must do so without making abusive comments, and without making offensive statements and attacking others, including the lawyers representing the plaintiff. … Direc...

6. Clearwater Cove Apartments Body Corporate 170989 v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 39 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...conflict for the Trust in being both claimant and respondent was exacerbated at hearing by the manner in which these parties presented their case. When the Trust was joined as a respondent it was represented by David Smyth. Mr Smyth filed a Statement of Defence for the Trust on 27 September 2010 submitting that Fletcher‘s and not the Trust was the developer. Shortly before the hearing Mr Smyth advised he was withdrawing as a result of a conflict. [16] The Trust was repre...

7. Judge v Care Park New Zealand Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...struck out. [3] Care Park has applied for the claim against it to be struck out on the ground that there is no arguable claim against it as the Privacy Commissioner found that Care Park had not interfered with Mr Judge’s privacy. In addition, the statement of claim specifies that the provisions of the Privacy Act relevant to the claim are information privacy principles 3, 10 and 11. Care Park claims that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction with respect to the claim against it under prin...

8. ENV-2018-AKL-000149 Fulton Hogan Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...1.5. Documents relied on ............................................................................................... 6 2. Changes to objectives and policies ............................................................................... 7 2.1. Statement of issue .................................................................................................. 7 2.2. Panel recommendation and reasons....................................................................... 7 3. Vegetatio...

9. ENV-2018-AKL-000150 Brookby Quarries Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.3 MB]

   NOTICE OF APPEAL 26 JULY 2018 Counsel instructed: Solicitors acting: Russell Bartlett QC / Bal Matheson D J Minhinnick / L J Eaton C/- Richmond Chambers P +64 9 367 8000 33 Shortland Street F +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 1008 PO Box 8 Auckland 1140 DX CX10085 Auckland BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV–2018 –AKL - AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE UNDER the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (&

10. LCRO 211/2018 AB v CD (3 July 2019) [pdf, 256 KB]

    ...AB had applied to this Office for a review of the Committee's decision on this and other issues concerning Mr CD's conduct when acting for [JJ]. 9 and related attendances, discovery, exploring settlement options, reviewing amended statement of claim and preparing an amended statement of defence. [60] The Committee was satisfied that there was “no duplication with [Mr CD’s] fees previously charged” in invoice 1444, 23 December 2015, in relation to the amended state...