3030 items matching your search terms
...Palmerston North City Council 31 Case against the seventh respondent, Doug Smith Ltd 32 Case against the eighth respondent, Equus Industries Ltd32 Case against the ninth respondent, Central Tile Distributors Ltd 33 THE DEFENCE FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT, THE WALSHAWS 34 THE DEFENCE FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT, PETER VINING 36 THE DEFENCE FOR THE THIRD RESPONDENT, WARREN & MAHONEY – THE ARCHITECT 37 THE DEFENCE FOR THE FOURTH R...
...required is an actual miscarriage of justice, or at least a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice, if the determination were allowed to stand. … [32] Dealing with the points raised by Mr Boyd, the Authority found that Mr Boyd’s statements that OJI had lied at the original investigation meeting, and that what Mr Boyd had been accused of was false, were consistent with the statement in reply which had been lodged on his behalf and his defence at the investigation meeting...
...representative who had acted for the defendant, Mohazam Jamal, when the proceedings were before the Authority. However, the representative did not have authority to accept service in these proceedings and on 21 August 2023, the Court directed that the statement of claim be served personally on the defendant. 1 Jamal v A Ifraz Investments Ltd [2023] NZERA 317 (Member Arthur). [3] The Court registry has followed up with the plaintiff multiple times to ascertain whether t...
...Dunn filed this claim in Tribunal. [19] On 16 November 2022, ACC filed an application to strike out Mr Dunn’s claim. On the same day Mr Dunn filed a notice opposing the strike out application and, on 22 November 2022, Mr Dunn filed an amended statement of claim. Both parties have made submissions in relation to the strike out application on the basis of Mr Dunn’s amended statement of claim of 22 November 2022. Mr Dunn’s claim [20] Mr Dunn alleges ACC subjected him to vic...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 28 March 2025 Ref: OIA 118936 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Reform of the Limitation Act 2010 Thank you for your email of 24 January 2025 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding reforms to the Limitation Act 2010 in respect of historic claims of abuse in care. Specifically, you
...after the agreement for sale and purchase had become binding. The allegation was not totally reliant on Mr Medricky‟s brief. [23] This response was pointed out in the Calderbank letter so from that time the claimant was on notice as to the defence which was ultimately successful. Page | 10 [24] Genuine belief is not sufficient to overcome the evidence first that the claimant had provided evidence regarding Xypex in 2008 and second that the claimant knew that Xype...
...one team to provide a great service to the public every day. Our team of over 4,000 people is working together for a fair and safe Aotearoa. We lead the justice sector administering the courts and tribunals, the legal aid system and the Public Defence Service, ensuring their integrity. We provide policy advice to the government on legislation relating to the justice system and New Zealand’s constitution. We help the Crown to honour its responsibilities to Māori. It is an exciting t...
...auye8nfjli 2023-12-19 11 :39:04 7 I N C O N F I D E N C E 54 A suitable legislative vehicle will need to be identified to progress the three legislative changes as part of the 2024 Legislation Programme. Impact Analysis Regulatory Impact Statement 55 Regulatory Impact Analysis is not required for the proposed first principles review. Instead, a regulatory impact analysis will be undertaken of proposals arising from the review. 56 The Treasury’s Regulatory Impact Analysis team...
...The first determination is invalid and therefore the second determination, in which the orders made in the first determination are confirmed, also is invalid. (b) The claim amounts to a claim to obtain a right to a defamation action without a defence. (c) The disputed correspondence attracted qualified privilege. (d) The plaintiffs were entitled to correspond with Ministers by virtue of the Protected Disclosures Act 2000. (e) The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 199...
...binds the Crown, and it is proposed that the Privacy Amendment Bill will follow that position. It will therefore bind the Crown. 7 IN CONFIDEN C E I N C O N F I D E N C E 8 I N C O N F I D E N C E Impact analysis Regulatory Impact Statement 43. The Treasury's Regulatory Impact Analysis team has determined that the five minor and technical amendments listed in Appendix One are exempt from the requirement to provide a Regulatory Impact Statement on the grounds that t...