1720 items matching your search terms
CONCRETE STRUCTURES (NZ) LIMITED v ADRIAN ROTTIER [2021] NZEmpC 95 [30 June 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 376/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CONCRETE STRUCTURES (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND ADRIAN ROTTIER Defendant Hearing: 17 and 18 May 2020 (Heard at Rotoru...
...NZDep2013 and Cycle 4 onwards uses NZDep2018. Disability In the report, disabled adults are defined using the Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) of disability questions. The questions ask if the respondent has experienced difficulties performing basic universal activities (walking, seeing, hearing, cognition, self-care and communication). Someone who reports “a lot of difficulty” with at least one of the six basic activities covered is defined as a disabled adult using this classification....
...an employment-related case. 20 18 See Poole v Horticulture and Food Institute of New Zealand Ltd [2002] 2 ERNZ 869 at [208]. 19 Rishworth and others The New Zealand Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, Victoria, 2004) at 96. 20 Butler v McCutcheon HC Auckland CIV-2011-404-923, 18 August 2011 at [58]. [56] I agree with the defendant that the NZBORA has no general application to this case except to the extent that...
...Ecologist with Wildland Consultants Ltd, based in Auckland. I have been employed as a consultant ecologist with Wildland Consultants since 2008. 24. In 2008 I graduated with a Masters with First Class Honours in Environmental Science from the University of Auckland. I also have a Graduate Diploma in Science and Post-Graduate Diploma in Environmental Science from the University of Auckland. 25. My work as an ecological consultant has covered a wide range of habitat types, inc...
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Nicole McKee Associate Minister of Justice Proactive release – Phase 4 of the Firearms Reform Programme – tranche 4 Date of issue: 31 January 2025 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA)
...occurred the outcomes available under company policy ranged from no further action through to termination of employment. [21] The disciplinary meeting took place on the morning of 5 March 2013. It was held at Allied’s office at Lincoln University. Although Mr McDowall met with Mr Marriott for approximately an hour, the matters raised in Mr McDowall’s letter of the previous day were discussed for 15 to 20 minutes. Mr McDowall took brief handwritten notes at the time...
...the Covenant Under New Zealand‟s present constitutional structure, it remains open to Parliament to legislate contrary to the Bill of Rights Act and the other legislative protections set out above and so to the Covenant. In its response to the Universal Periodic Review lodged in July 2009, the New Zealand Government noted that it had agreed to consider further constitutional protection of human rights. Question 2. Measures taken to respond to indications of inconsistency As...
...have been in that position since December 2021. Section 87F and 198D Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Peter Warwick Stacey – Air Quality 4 6. I hold a Bachelor of Science from The University of Auckland and a Graduate Diploma in Business from Auckland University of Technology. 7. I am a Member of the Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand and a Certified Air Quality Professional. 8. I have more than 20 yea...
...of what was happening is all that I am concerned about, you will agree? Ms Scholtens: And that‘s for your evidence. This witness isn‘t going to be able to help you with that. Mr Dorbu: He will help a lot because what makes sense is universal. Ms Scholtens: I think I understand. Mr Dorbu: The import is, $122,000 extra that they were going to get from the purchasers was why they wanted to collapse Mr Barge‘s agreement. Ms Scholtens: You are looking at motive for c...
...Otherwise, the court has a residual discretion whether or not to make a s293(1) direction (although any material failure to give effect to a NPS or RPS would clearly weigh in favour of exercising that discretion). 15 16 17 18 19 Mawhinney v Auckland Council (2011) 16 ELRNZ 608 (HC). Mawhinney, at (11 5]. Auckland Council v Byerley Park Limited [2013] NZHC 3402. Byerley Park, at [41] and [42], citing Hamilton City Council v Historic Places Trust {2005] NZRMA 145, at [25]....