1720 items matching your search terms
BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND v XI (ROBERT) CHEN [2025] NZEmpC 69 [4 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 141/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND Plaintiff AND XI (ROBERT) CHEN Defendant EMPC 181/2024 IN T
CLAIM NO: 00499 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PETER WILLIAM GRAY and SUSAN FRANCES GRAY Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 8 & 9 November 2005 Appearances: Grant Shand for the Claimants No appearance by or on behalf of the First respondent John Bierre and Andrew Wedekind for the Fifth respondent Det
CLAIM NO: 376 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JANICE LORRAINE and NOEL EWART HILL Claimants AND DIANNE and ROSS WHIMP First Respondents AND AKITA CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND EUROBRIK PRODUCTS LTD Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, Jeff Young Contractors Ltd having been struck out AND No Fifth Respondent, David John Follas having been struck out AND No Sixth Respon
...discretion, the Court may have regard to “any conduct of the parties tending to increase or contain costs”. [15] In their submissions, counsel referred to the well-established principles as set out in the Court of Appeal judgments of Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee;6 Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd 7 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly.8 4 At [235] – [236]. 5 At [244] – [246]. 6 Victoria University of Wellington v...
...decision of 3 September 2008). She found him credible. He said that following the amputation, he was in extreme pain and could not use the artificial leg. Mr Allen, the amputating surgeon, told him the problem must be the artificial leg and an Auckland surgeon told him it was “in his head”. Before the revision surgery, Mr McDonald said he was in agony with every step but after the surgery, the pain was alleviated. Contemporary medical evidence [13] Mr Allen, the orthopa...
...ACR 168/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GABRIEL NEDELCU Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 8 May 2023 Heard at: Auckland Appearances: B Hinchcliffe for the appellant I Hunt for the respondent Judgment: 27 November 2023 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE I C CARTER [Suspensi...
...legal position in relation to the Corporation’s ability to suspend entitlements under s 117(1) is summarised by Judge Barber in the decision of Furst:6 5 R J Castriotta and J M Murthy, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Texas Science Centre, Houston, Texas, USA – CNS drugs 2011: 25(3): 175-185. 6 Furst v Accident Compensation Corporation [2011] NZACC 379. [12] Pursuant to s.117(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 ACC may cancel a cl...
...before it, Mrs and Mr Lowe would seek interim relief. [50] This prompted further correspondence from Mr O’Brien on behalf of the company, which included additional information and responses. Mr O’Brien advised 8 Vice-Chancellor of Massey University v Wrigley (2011) 9 NZELC 93,782; [2011] NZEmpC 37. that, in order to give Mrs and Mr Lowe one further and final opportunity to provide feedback, they could provide written feedback by 4pm on Friday 29 November and that a...
...employer’s decision to dismiss an employee was justified, the Court is often required to consider alleged disparities of treatment. 14 Matthes v New Zealand Post Ltd [1994] 1 ERNZ 994 (CA) at 997–998; see also Wiles v Vice- Chancellor of the University of Auckland [2024] NZEmpC 123 at [98]. 15 Tranz Rail Ltd v Rail & Maritime Transport Union (Inc) [1999] 1 ERNZ 460 (CA) at [26]. 16 At [27]. 17 At [27]. 18 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [2019] NZEmpC...
DOUBLE SIDED Decision No, C\ <; 1 12003 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 120 of the Act BETWEEN CLIFFORD BAY MARINE FARMS LIMITED (RMA 172/03) THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (RMA 103/01) FIDENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY (INC) (RMA 114/01) Appellants MARLBOROUGH DISTIDCT COUNCIL Respondent BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Environment Judge J R Jackson (presiding) Environment Commissioner C E