Search Results

1. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-Reporting-to-the-Police.xlsx [xlsx, 381 KB]

   ...NZDep2013 and Cycle 4 uses NZDep2018. Disability In the report, adults with disability are defined using the Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) of disability questions. The questions ask if the respondent has experienced difficulties performing basic universal activities (walking, seeing, hearing, cognition, self-care and communication). Someone who reports “a lot of difficulty” with at least one of the six basic activities covered is defined as a person with a disability using this classi...

2. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-Reporting-to-the-Police-v2 [xlsx, 381 KB]

   ...3 use NZDep2013 and Cycle 4 uses NZDep2018. Disability In the report, disabled adults are defined using the Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) of disability questions. The questions ask if the respondent has experienced difficulties performing basic universal activities (walking, seeing, hearing, cognition, self-care and communication). Someone who reports “a lot of difficulty” with at least one of the six basic activities covered is defined as a disabled adult using this classification....

3. E91 Kurt Grant - Construction Methodology - RE – Applicant [pdf, 9.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OF KURT ADR

4. Canterbury Earthquake CTV Building inquiry

   Minute: Inquiry into the deaths of Dr Tamara Cvetanova and others IN THE CORONERS COURTAT CHRISTCHURCH MINUTE OF CORONER G MATENGA INQUIRY INTO THE DEATHS OF Dr TAMARA CVETANOVA AND OTHERS [1] Following the release of my Findings dated 25 March 2014 ("the Findings") in respect of this inquiry, Ms Smith, Solicitor for NZFS brought to my attention via Memorandum dated 27 March 2014, some typographical errors which she asked to be corrected. Although there is no specific power in the Coroners Act 2

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court >
   2. Findings & recommendations >
   3. Findings of public interest

5. Balatbat v Sparks [2016] NZIACDT 27 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...Advisers Authority [2012] NZHC 1069, and reflected in section 3 of the Act. [27] It is evident that the legislative scheme is designed to exclude unlicensed people from engaging in the delivery of professional services to a degree that is far from universal in the regulation of professional service delivery. [28] It was foreseeable that some people who had formerly provided immigration services, and failed to gain a licence, would seek to have a licensed person 8 ...

6. JE v AC and SY LCRO 259/2012 (17 February 2015) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...than an appeal, and gives the LCRO discretion as to the approach to be taken 7 on any particular review and the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review. Review Hearing [31] The parties attended a review hearing in Auckland on 23 July 2014 and were represented by counsel. Review Issues Prejudice and Bias [32] There is no evidence of bias by the Committee, or prejudice against Mrs JE or her clients as Mrs JE alleges. Those aspects of Mrs JE’s revie...

7. Tapiki and Eru v New Zealand Parole Board [2019] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...privacy of any other person (other than the offender). [34] While the phrase “unduly interfere” is defined neither by the Parole Act nor by the Privacy Act it carries its ordinary meaning of inappropriate or unjustifiable. See OED Online (Oxford University Press, June 2014). What is undue is clearly dependent on context. See R v B [1996] 1 NZLR 385 (CA) at 387. That context will include the nature of the privacy interest of the “other person” as well as the nature and degree o...

8. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 22 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA REFERENCE NO. HRRT 28/2021 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN DIJ PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms K Anderson, Deputy Chairperson Dr P Davies, Member Ms WV Gilchrist, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms M Dew KC and Mr J Hansen for plaintiff Mr D Jones and Ms N White for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 3-5 October 2022 (a...

9. Evaluation of Victim Support’s Homicide Caseworker Support Service [pdf, 790 KB]

   Evaluation of Victim Support’s Full-time Homicide Caseworker Support Service 9 November 2015 Alison Chetwin Dr Sue Carswell Dr Trish Young Integrity Professionals 2 Acknowledgements The evaluation team wish to thank the family members who generously shared their experiences for this evaluation. We also thank the other participants and Victim Support staff who assisted with access to information for the

10. [2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

    B V VIRGIN AUSTRALIA (NZ) EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED, PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC BLUE EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED NZEmpC CHCH [2013] NZEmpC 40 [20 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 40 CRC 6/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN B Plaintiff AND VIRGIN AUSTRALIA (NZ) EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED, PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC BLUE EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING L