1727 items matching your search terms
...tests in s 70. We are bound by the findings in Latimer and Fountain that the CPP meets these tests. 5 Dr M Claire Dale and Susan St John New Zealand Superannuation Policy and Overseas State Pensions (University of Auckland Business School, September 2016). 5 [16] Accordingly, we have no hesitation in concluding that the CPP payments to the appellant must be deducted from his NZS entitlement. Order [17] The appeal is dismis...
...Court decides cases that have general importance for practitioners of employment law as well as for the particular parties. These will include some judgments of the full Court and others examining and applying new law 2011 Grant v Vice-Chancellor of University of Otago [2011] NZEmpC 172 Parties agreed to Authority issuing recommendation under s 173A. Recommendation would become determination if parties did not object after 10 days. Plaintiff's counsel sought extension of time and defendant and...
...the Calderbank offers made in the Authority. The Court, for reasons explained in the judgment, declined to take into account the Calderbank offers made in the Authority. 18 [30] The approach taken in Kaipara and followed in O'Connor v University of Auckland Students’ Association Incorporated would appear to be consistent with that taken by the Australian Courts towards Calderbank offers. The rationale in that jurisdiction is that the proceedings on appeal are, in effect,...
...bridget.irving@gallawaycookallan.co.nz Email: campbell.hodgson@gallawaycookallan.co.nz 1 BI-309448-3-581-V2 STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF JOHN LAURENCE CRAIG INTRODUCTION 1. My name is John Laurence Craig. I have a BSc (1st Class Honours) in ecology from Otago University and a PhD in ecology from Massey University. I have 46 years’ experience working in New Zealand environments, both as a researcher and as an expert witness relating to terrestrial ecology, especially...
...these are read by people of all ages and are said by some to be just a joke. We young people should not be joke. Dr Leonie Pihama [39] Dr Pihama is Te Atiawa, Ngā Māhanga ā Taira and Ngāti Māhanga. She has a BA, MA (Hons) and Ph.D from the University of Auckland and is Director of Waikato University’s Te Mata Punenga o Te Kotahi – Te Kotahi Research Institute. She is also director of an independent Māori research company and Associate Professor at Te Puna Wānanga, Schoo...
...responsibilities in- __ -,,-__ ==~~ __ !"----J clude the Muriwhenua, Mohaka and Ngai Tahu claims. Students Murray Hemi of Ngati Kahungunu ki Wairarapa and Kiritahi Takiari of Te Atihaunui-a Paparangi and Tainui join the Tribunal's staff during University holidays. Kiritahi is studying law and Maori at Victoria University; Murray is completing an MSc in resource management at Lincoln College. He has a BA Maori from Canterbury. ... W AI 95: Stephens Island One further media...
...Director-General for Primary Industries [2015] NZEmpC 54. 3 Abernethy v Dynea New Zealand Ltd (No 1) [2007] ERNZ 271, at [59]. Background [6] Mr Goel is an Indian national. He holds a Bachelor's Degree in Commerce with Honours from the University of Delhi. He also holds a Diploma in Introduction to Chartered Accountancy. On 25 November 2008, Immigration New Zealand granted Mr Goel a multiple student visa enabling him to study for a graduate diploma in business st...
...declining leave to remove a matter to the Court has one or two remedial avenues available to it. This issue has been touched on in a number of previous cases, but the point appears to have been left open. [45] In Vice-Chancellor of Lincoln University v Stewart (No 2) the Court observed:19 … it is clearly preferable that a party dissatisfied with the Authority’s determination of an application for removal should proceed under the particular provisions in s 178(3) and s...
...for a new Deputy Chair of the Tribunal, although this process had not been finalised by year end.1 4. 2021–2022 was a challenging year for the Tribunal because of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. August–November 2021 saw a lockdown in Auckland which compelled Auckland- based members to work from home, often in difficult circumstances. The number of staff members on site had to be limited and this negatively impacted the timely receipt of appeal files, their despatch to mem...
...for the proceedings to remain with the Court. This is a submission which is often made when applications for removal are being considered. It is not a submission which is properly based. While that was the result in Vice-Chancellor of Lincoln University v Stewart (No 2), the Court there made clear that the circumstances of that case were unusual and that it:2 ... should not be taken as an indication of the conclusion which might be reached in other cases… the discretion is more...